My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1952_0515
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
195x
>
1952
>
CC_Minutes_1952_0515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:45:26 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 5:31:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/15/1952
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br /> <br />213 <br /> <br />ing building code. Has he been chosen over more qualified persons.She did not know <br />how any man could accept the job and still be County Commissioner. <br /> <br />Mayor Connor arose and told the crowd the many problems we have. The fees paid <br />the building inspector J.nthe past,and under the new sat up the building inspector <br />would have to put in 40 hours per week for 2500.00 per year, so a person would have to <br />have some other income beside. He told the group the building permits would be issued <br />at the Village office after June 1st. and reports would be made out and filed at the <br />office, and there would be no chance of any wrong doing. <br />Mr. Schmidt told of his being able to put in the required number of hours as <br />required by the council as the Commissioners only have two meetings per month. <br />Reiling told of the conditions existing in the County Attorneys office.He said <br />the inspector would only have to put in three hours inspecting all the Yillage <br />buildings. The rest of the t-:.me he would have on his hands. <br />Mayor Connor told of the new basis we would work on, which is a big improvement <br />over the pa!5t. <br />Mr. Leier said we ought to put in some person who has had ~ome experience as a <br />building inspector, and asked why anybody could do their own wiring. Mrs Alvin Leier <br />asked if the new inspector had the needed experience and if he could read a blueprint. <br />Mr. Membrez spoke about the experience Schmidt had. He helped write the Ramsey <br />County building code before it was adopted ten years ago. He felt Tony Schmidt could <br />handle the job as he has had a lot of experience in his years as County Commissioner. <br />and has built up a good relationship between the County Commissioners in the city and <br />the rural area and felt it was a good thing to do. <br /> <br />Mrs Collins of Transit Ave asked if we could have a street sign erected an Rice <br />St as the bus refuses to stop there. Membrez moved,secondod by WillmuB that we order <br />and have installed a street sign at Rice St and Transi t Ave. Roll c all Aye s- (5) Nay( 0) · <br /> <br />Mr. Markus asked what has been done about the water problem on his property, and <br />when he could expect some relief. He was told the Council had not received the report <br />from the County Surveyor's Dept. as yet. <br /> <br />"I <br />Mr. Schmidt of 72 Hatch st. asked what had been done about WoodbridgeSt. The clerk! <br />reported on what he had found out to date. "~ <br /> <br />Mr. McMillan of Ralph Thomas EnginBering Co said he had submitted a proposal to <br />the clerk for the Councils consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Leier asked why Council meetings could not be held in the evening. The Clerk <br />read the dates that evening meetings were held since the first of the year. <br /> <br />Ted Schultz inquired what had been done on the drainage line through the school <br />property. The Mayor said he would check on it Wed. morning when in town at the County <br />Surveyor's Dept. <br /> <br />Mr. Ratfield asked again about Ryan Ave. saying he was up against a problem he <br />would like solved. Ifter much discussion and there being only a difference of 200.00 <br />between the owners it was suggested that he assume the 200.00 and go ah~ad and put the <br />road in. <br /> <br />Membrez mo¡ed,seconded by Hammersten after reconsidering the grading of Ryan Ave. <br />from 660 feet ~o Lexington Ave.on a 30 foot width basis, that grading that portion <br />only 30 feet is not practical, therefor the contractor should be notified that the <br />road will not be acceptable,having learned that an easement can be obtained for a <br />30 foot width of the Peterson property. Permission given April 15 to build a ðO foot <br />road on Ryan to the Peterson property, then finish off with a 30 foot width to Lexing- <br />ton Ave.be revoked and Rattield notified immediatly. Roll call Ayes-(5) Nayes-(O). <br />Ratfield was to be notified not to do any grading on any part of Shryer from <br />Fernwood to Lexington until he receives permission trom the Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.