My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2020-11-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2020
>
2020-11-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2021 4:05:05 PM
Creation date
1/29/2021 4:04:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/24/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Ristow reviewed the information on fleet electrification and prioritization with <br />the Commission. He noted this will be coming forward later in 2021. <br />Vice Chair Huiett inquired about the B3 data being entered and she wondered how <br />that interfaces with the GreenStep Cities Program. <br />Mr. Ristow reviewed the information with the Commission. <br />Chair Wozniak asked for an update on the Utility rates since the October meeting. <br />Mr. Culver reviewed with the Commission the Finance Commission and City <br />Council meeting outcomes regarding the Utility rates. He noted the Finance <br />Commission recommended Option One and the City Council is still considering it. <br />6. Civic Campus Master Plan Update <br />Mr. Culver reviewed the Civic Campus Master Plan update with the Commission. <br />He noted there are no current plans to do anything and no money is earmarked for <br />this. <br />Member Spencer indicated he did go through the presentation and also went to the <br />site. He explained was glad to hear the City reconsidering doing away with the <br />little pocket park because he thought it does get used by the apartment complex. <br />When looking at the presentation some of the plans put in greenspace in the main <br />City Campus as it sits now, and he did not see that working and being used other <br />than grass that will need to be mowed. The reuse of the City buildings is a definite <br />plus in his mind. One of the bigger things is the City just installed solar panels and <br />would the City want to take them down and reinstall them somewhere else. The <br />other thing is doing away with Veterans Park and the VFW, when looking on <br />Google Maps there are actually two little soccer fields in Veterans Park and seems <br />to get a little use. One thing he did see is if Veterans Park is taken away would <br />there be some upgrades done in the Howard Johnson Park area to help <br />accommodate for some little league soccer or something like that. <br />Mr. Culver explained regarding the park area, the City actually has a policy of no <br />net loss of park land so the City would need to figure out how to make up that park <br />area if Veterans Park were taken away. <br />Member Misra indicated she appreciated the initial comments about the design and <br />the idea of preserving a certain amount of green space which is one of the areas she <br />is interested in. It seems like Roseville has had a sort of identity as the City that <br />has paid some respects to that and is reflected in the area around City Hall and the <br />area just east of City Hall. She thought it was beautifully designed and would like <br />to see that sort of concept built into this somehow. <br />Vice Chair Huiett mentioned one of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan is for <br />more sustainable designs so as the City goes forward some of the building massing <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.