Laserfiche WebLink
34term duration, the normal reasonable allowance of time to correct certain prohibited activity <br />35 makes enforcement difficult. This is because the violation is corrected within the compliance <br />36period typically provided by the nature of the rental ceasing or switchingtenancy(examples <br />37include vehicles and parking). Additionally, one might suggest the burden of noncompliance <br />38under any of these codes is overly burdensome to the immediate neighborhood due to the nature <br />39of the short-term term occupancy of the property causing the problem. <br />40 3. Options for greater regulation <br />41There are pros and cons to various ways of regulation. Staff would note the most obvious con is <br />42an inability of the City to know and/or confirm the duration of a rental. A rental agreement or <br />43lease is a legal document of which the City is not a party to. Bearing this in mind, staff would <br />44offer the following for discussion: <br />45 Define “short-term rental” as a duly registered rental property which may or may not be <br />46owner-occupied that isrented to a family (as currently defined in City Code Section <br />471001.10) for not more than 30 consecutive days(or whatever period of time deemed <br />48 appropriate by Council). Once the definition is determined, Council could decide to <br />49 prohibit short-term rentals entirely or impose additional conditions on them, which could <br />50 be written into the registration chapter (907). In regards to notification of a timeframe <br />51 restriction, staff would suggest an acknowledgement be added to the rental registration <br />52 form, whereby when registering the owner/manager must acknowledge the timeframe <br />53 restriction. <br />54 Instead of, or in addition to focusing on the duration of the rental, one could focus on <br />55 regulating the offensive activities at rental properties. This could include the following: <br />56 o Prohibiting the use of registered rental properties for conducting outdoor <br />57gatherings in excess of 10 persons (or whichever number the Council deems <br />58 appropriate) and indoor gatherings of 20 persons (or whichever number the <br />59Council deems appropriate). The idea would be to prohibit someone from renting <br />60a property solely to hold a party/event of a size that would cause disruptions to the <br />61 immediate area. <br />62 o Add to the list of prohibited Home Occupations (1011.12.B.3.l-Attachment A), <br />63 “indoor or outdoor gatherings as restricted under City Code, Chapter 907 <br />64 regarding registered rentals”. <br />65 o Provide for a clearer process to suspend or revoke a registered rental under <br />66 Chapter 907. Currently, the authority is granted to the Community Development <br />67 Director. It may be more appropriate to define specific conditions whereby, if <br />68 met, a suspension and/or revocation will be heard before the City Council. The <br />69 list of committed violations under this section should be reviewed to ensure all <br />70 applicable offensive behaviors are included. Additionally, a number should be <br />71 established within a specific period of time, say, three violations within three <br />72 months triggers review by City Council. Lastly, the penalties could get <br /> <br />