My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021_0208_CCPacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2021
>
2021_0208_CCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2022 1:47:53 PM
Creation date
1/13/2022 1:47:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/8/2021
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
254
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, January 11, 2021 <br />Page 23 <br />985 <br />986 Mayor Roe indicated the motion would be to direct the ordinance be brought back <br />987 to the Council if the amendment is approved. He explained there is a motion to <br />988 amend the original motion, which is to adopt the language as presented. The motion <br />989 to amend is to direct bringing back the ordinance with the changes in the definition, <br />990 adding tobacco retailer as outlined, limiting the total number of licenses for tobacco <br />991 retailers to four, as well as cleaning up the language in Chapter 306.06 A4 related <br />992 to those criteria and Chapter 306.06 C for flavored tobacco, providing the exemp- <br />993 tion for the tobacco retailer. <br />994 <br />995 Roll Call <br />996 Ayes: Willmus, Etten, and Roe. <br />997 Nays: Strahan and Groff. <br />998 <br />999 Mayor Roe indicated the motion to amend passed 3 ayes to 2 nays so the Council <br />1000 needs to vote on the original motion as amended. <br />1001 <br />1002 Mr. Trudgeon asked if the Council was voting on the entire Ordinance as amended <br />1003 or is this being brought back. <br />1004 <br />1005 Mayor Roe explained the amendment requires the Ordinance to be brought back so <br />1006 it substitutes the amendment in place of the original motion. <br />1007 <br />1008 Roll Call <br />1009 Ayes: Willmus, Strahan, Etten, Groff and Roe. <br />1010 Nays: None <br />1011 <br />1012 Recess <br />1013 Mayor Roe recessed the meeting at approximately 8:55 p.m., and reconvened at approxi- <br />1014 mately 9:00 p.m. <br />1015 <br />1016 e. Consider Draft Ordinance Regarding Rental Registration and Short-Term <br />1017 Rental Licensing <br />1018 Community Development Director Janice Gundlach briefly highlighted this item <br />1019 as detailed in the Request For Council Action and related attachments dated January <br />1020 11, 2021. <br />1021 <br />1022 Councilmember Strahan stated she needed to better understand what the CityÓs goal <br />1023 is because in what is being sent forward, reading what people are asking of the City, <br />1024 what concerns they have, and in looking at other constituencies and municipalities, <br />1025 short term rental rules and regulations, it does not seem like the City is at that phase. <br />1026 If the City is looking at specifics, like a physical, visual demarcation of property <br />1027 lines, to her it seems it would need a lot more detail from what has been provided. <br />1028 She requested more information. <br />1029 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.