My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02142022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 02142022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2022 10:34:01 AM
Creation date
2/10/2022 10:32:44 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 of 6 <br /> 122 <br />The Goodmanson Construction Base Bid is $914,450. Inclusion of each of the recommended alternates 123 <br />(alternate #1, #2, #3 and #5) would add a cost of $123,500, for a package total of $1,037,950. 124 <br /> 125 <br />Project clarification has been successfully conducted with Goodmanson Construction Inc. 126 <br /> 127 <br />TOTAL PROJECT SUMMARY 128 <br />With the proposal packages outlined above, the current cost breakdown of the project is: 129 <br /> 130 <br /> <br />Pre-Bid <br />Engineer’s <br />Cost <br />Estimates <br />Bid Amounts <br />with <br />Recommended <br />Alternates <br />Package 1: Refrigeration $1,970,502 $1,942,450 <br />Package 2: Site $920,330 $1,037,950 <br />Package 3: Padding System $326,600 $326,600* <br />Engineering (Awarded June 21, 2021) $273,750 $273,750 <br />Other Expenses (Survey work & ADA Engineering) $15,900 $15,900 <br />Contingency on Remaining Projects $392,918 $303,350 <br />TOTAL $3,900,000 $3,900,000 <br />*Package 3 is currently and engineer’s estimate. 131 <br /> 132 <br />The recommended bids are currently within budget. 133 <br />As noted above, at this time staff is recommending not accepting the alternate bid #1 of Package 1 134 <br />(replacement of all secondary piping) and accessories in the mechanical room, pending further 135 <br />examination. Due to the age of the piping (it was upgraded in 2005) and what can be visually inspected, 136 <br />further replacement is not expected. However, the condition cannot be known until further inspection 137 <br />is conducted once the project is under way. If the existing piping is found to be failing, staff would 138 <br />propose adding Package 1, Alternate 1 as a change order at a cost of $261,000. 139 <br />The proposed construction timeframe is March 2022 to October 2022. 140 <br />Staff will be prepared to provide a brief summary to you. 141 <br /> 142 <br />POLICY OBJECTIVE 143 <br />The proposed project is consistent with providing safe, efficient and desirable facilities for all users, 144 <br />spectators and staff and to address safety and efficiency issues as a high priority during the course of 145 <br />business. 146 <br />The bidding process is consistent with city policy and state law on performing projects for the safe 147 <br />and efficient operation of the city infrastructure. 148 <br />BUDGET IMPLICATIONS 149 <br />The city is currently committed to expend $292,540 for design and engineering work in previously 150 <br />executed agreements related to this project. 151
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.