CCP 02282022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

72 implemented to provide a more seamless transfer of the private roadway to the City in the future,if 73 needed, and will help prevent site improvements from being constructed over this area by individual 74 lot owners. 75 2. A 10-foot wide Utility and Drainage Easement shall be provided along the east, west, and 76 south sides of the proposed plat. th 77 The proposed plat of Twin Lakes 4Addition does not depict the easement described in this condition 78 and will have to be revised. 79 Storm Water Management 80 The City Engineer’s memo indicates the following: 81 Storm sewer would be private. 82 The storm water management for the site has been permitted by the City and the Watershed 83 district for general commercial development. This site plan meets the current permit 84 requirements. No additional storm sewer management is needed. 85 Based on the above, all storm water requirements for the plat have been met. 86 Tree Preservation 87 The tree preservation and replacement requirements in §1011.04 of the City Code provide a way to 88 quantify the amount of tree material being removed for a given project and to calculate the resulting 89 tree replacement obligation. However, this site only included three trees, which were located adjacent 90 to the 1755 County Road C building and were removed as a component of site preparation. The 91 proposed landscape plan will provide an abundance of greenery, including trees, to more than offset 92 the three removed trees. 93 Park Dedication 94 This subdivision proposal elicits the park dedication requirement based upon the revised park 95 dedication requirements adopted by the City Council via Ordinance 1601 on June 21, 2021. Park 96 dedication of commercial property is required at 10% of the fair market value or 10% land dedication, 97 or a combination thereof.As such, the City could accept a dedication of up to approximately .799 98 acres of land (based on the requirement to dedicate up to 10% of the land of the 7.99-acre development 99 site) or a dedication of cash in lieu of land, or an equivalent combination of land and cash. 100 The Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) reviewed the proposal at its meeting on January 4, 2022. 101 There was discussion of land dedication, but based upon the developer’s statement that there was not 102 sufficient space on the development for usable park land, theCommission recommended a dedication 103 of cash in lieu of land. Based on the fee of 10% of the fair market value to satisfy the park dedication 104 requirement, the dedication amount would be $431,120 (10% of the $4,311,200 Ramsey County 105 Estimated Market Value). An excerpt of the draft January 4 PRC minutes is included with this RPCA 106 as part of Attachment E. PF21-020_TLS_MajorPlat_RPCA_020222 Page 3 of 4