My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 02282022
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2022
>
CCP 02282022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2022 11:57:12 AM
Creation date
3/3/2022 11:56:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/7/2022
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment A <br />28 P ROJECT R EVIEW <br />29 The proposed Bank of America will share its site with four other developments, two of which <br />30 also seek a proposed drive-through (Taco Bell and Take 5 Car Wash). The main site access to <br />31 Twin Lakes Station is via the signalized intersection at County Road C and Hershel Street <br />32 (private road), with a secondary ingress located at the western-most point of the site, adjacent to <br />33 Bank of America. <br />34 When looking at the overall site plan, Bank of America is the western-most lot in the overall <br />35 Twin Lakes Station development, and the proposed drive-through lies to the east and slightly <br />36 south of the proposed building and adjacent to County Road C. However the drive-through lane <br />37 does not lie between the building and the public street. Access to the site is provided from the <br />38 private drive at the north, with the drive-through lane entering from the east side of the parking <br />39 lot looping east to west adjacent to County Road C to the teller/ATM lanes and building. There <br />40 are three lanes proposed for the bank drive-through (two teller/ATM lanes and one by-pass lane), <br />41 with vehicles exiting north into the parking lot area. The trash and recycling enclosure is located <br />42 adjacent to the drive-through entrance on the east side of the site. <br />43 Typically, a traffic study is a component of a drive-through facility, however this proposed <br />44 development was included in the 2020 Twin Lakes Station Environmental Assessment <br />45 Worksheet (EAW) that included an extensive traffic study, albeit with only one drive-through <br />46 facility. Given the two additional drive-through businesses currently proposed at Twin Lakes <br />47 Station, the applicant was required to provide the City Engineer updated traffic information <br />48 related tothe drive-through facilities, including queuing and circulation within the site. This <br />49 information was provided by Kimley-Horn and reviewed by the City’s traffic consultant, SRF <br />50 Consulting Group (Attachment D). It should be noted, in accordance with the EAW process, an <br />51 extensive public notification and comment period occurred whereby many governmental entities <br />52 and the broader public had the opportunity to comment on traffic and safety impacts from the <br />53 proposed drive-through facilities. <br />54 Zoning Code Sections §1009.02.C and §1009.02.D.12 establish general standards and criteria <br />55 applying to all conditional uses and specific standards and criteria applying to drive-through <br />56 facilities. The Planning Division’s review of these criteria can be found below in the Conditional <br />57 Use Analysis section. <br />58 C ONDITIONAL U SE A NALYSIS <br />59 R EVIEW OF G ENERAL C ONDITIONAL U SE C RITERIA: Section 1009.02.C of the Zoning Code <br />60 establishes general standards and criteria for all conditional uses. When deciding on whether to <br />61 approve or deny a conditional use, the Planning Commission (and City Council) must review the <br />62 proposal and determine if compliance can be achieved with the stated findings. <br />63 The general code standards of §1009.02.C are as follows: <br />64 a. The proposed use is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. While a drive-through <br />65 facility doesn’t appreciably advance the goals of the Comprehensive Plan aside from <br />66 facilitating continued investment in a property, Planning Division staff believes it does not <br />67 conflict with the Comprehensive Plan either. More specifically, the General and Commercial <br />68 Area Goals and Policies sections of the Comprehensive Plan include a number of policies <br />69 related to reinvestment, redevelopment, quality development, and scale. The proposed drive- <br />70 through is one component of a larger investment at the Twin Lakes Station redevelopment <br />71 area, which would align with the related goals and polices of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />PF21-020_RPCA_BOA_CU_020222 <br />Page 2 of 5 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.