My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022_0927_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2022
>
2022_0927_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2022 2:25:06 PM
Creation date
9/28/2022 2:22:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/27/2022
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
34 4. Communication Items <br />35 Public Works Director Culver provided a brief review and update on projects and <br />36 maintenance activities listed in the staff report dated August 23, 2022. <br />37 <br />38 Mr. Culver updated the Commission on the Commission vacancy and <br />39 interview/appointment process coming up. <br />40 <br />41 Chair Ficek indicated the student Commission Member is on a separate timeline <br />42 from the Commission appointment. He thought the Council changed the <br />43 requirements. <br />44 <br />45 Mr. Culver explained the Council discussed changes but there were no changes <br />46 made. The Youth Commissioner still needs to be a Roseville resident to apply to <br />47 be a Youth Commission Member. <br />48 <br />49 Chair Ficek asked if most of the projects, with the exception of B2, are expected to <br />50 wrap up by the start of the State Fair. <br />51 r <br />52 Mr. Culver explained some projects will be taking a pause or will be far enough <br />53 away from the park and ride areas to not be an issue. <br />54 <br />55 Member Cicha asked if the City had any policy about wearing life preservers for <br />56 their employees or contractors that are out on a boat. <br />57 <br />58 Mr. Culver explained there is not too much of that in the City. He asked Mr. <br />59 Johnson if the City requires contractors to wear life jackets. <br />60 <br />61 Mr. Johnson believed the City at least has the contractors have life preservers in <br />62 their boats. <br />63 <br />64 Mr. Culver thought the City would defer to OSHA in that regard. He thought if the <br />65 City was hiring someone to be on a boat, there would be OSHA regulations for that <br />66 type of activity and he imagined life preservers would be mentioned to be at least <br />67 on the boat, but he was not familiar with that. <br />68 <br />69 Chair Ficek noticed the City sent out fifteen hundred mailings and wondered if <br />70 there was any response or updates to provide. <br />71 <br />72 Ms. Bakken indicated staff has had a handful of responses but compared to the last <br />73 mailing sent out, at least for businesses, staff has had more people call in with <br />74 questions about environmental things. <br />75 <br />76 Chair Ficek noticed the tree sale was going on and he asked how that was working <br />77 out. <br />78 <br />79 Ms. Bakken explained the tree sale is almost done and extremely popular. <br />Page 2 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.