My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2022_0927_PWETCPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2022
>
2022_0927_PWETCPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2022 2:25:06 PM
Creation date
9/28/2022 2:22:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/27/2022
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
126 Ms. Bakken explained she did not know exactly what Eureka's market is for their <br />127 recycling. She noted she was just going off of what they will accept. She thought <br />128 that would be a good question for Eureka and if they have had issues with plastic <br />129 number 5. <br />130 <br />131 Mr. Johnson explained the City gets updates from Eureka quarterly and since they <br />132 are keeping a lot of the City's material as local as they can, they have not had an <br />133 issue recycling most if not all of it. The City does not see the same flood of plastics <br />134 that a lot of the coasts have just because they are trying to ship it out. Eureka has <br />135 been really good about utilizing all of the City's materials. He noted the City has <br />136 had good success with it and did not think the City was in that nine percent range, <br />137 but he could check with Eureka again to see if they have a specific number for it. <br />138 <br />139 Member Hodder asked if black plastics would be included in compostable <br />140 materials. <br />141 <br />142 Ms. Bakken indicated the black plastic is not recyclable. <br />143 <br />144 Member Ficek asked the Commission if the City needed something like this. He <br />145 thought the Commission could discuss the need and details. <br />146 <br />147 The Commission agreed the City should move forward with something like this. <br />148 <br />149 Member Hodder thought it was important to educate businesses and the general <br />150 public about what their options are. <br />151 <br />152 Chair Ficek agreed and thought this was the correct way to move forward with the <br />153 phasing of it. He indicated by looking at the table in the packet if staff could focus <br />154 on whichever ordinance staff thought was closest to what they wanted to emulate, <br />155 the Commission could go down the list. <br />156 <br />157 Ms. Bakken indicated staff does like St. Louis Park's approach to this. She thought <br />158 all of the ordinances are similar with the types of materials required and the types <br />159 of businesses that are exempt. She explained staff liked that St. Louis Park has <br />160 been easing their businesses in and liked that they did the educational piece with a <br />161 vendor fair. She explained that would be her recommendation. She indicated St. <br />162 Louis Park does have a solid waste staff that manages it, but this could fall under <br />163 Public Works for complaint -based enforcement. <br />164 <br />165 Mr. Johnson agreed with Ms. Bakken. <br />166 <br />167 Ms. Bakken recommended to keep the recommendation in that materials with lids <br />168 have the same type of material throughout so it is easier for the consumer to know <br />169 what to do. She noted St. Louis Park and Edina does that as well. <br />170 <br />Page 4 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.