My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CCP 03062023
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2023
>
CCP 03062023
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/3/2023 2:19:11 PM
Creation date
3/3/2023 2:18:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
3/6/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
239
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />67 City Code Section 906.07(Property Maintenance): Requires every sink, lavatory, water closet <br />68 or other plumbing fixture to be properly connected to either a public water system or an <br />69 approved private water system. This same section requires kitchen sinks and lavatories to be <br />70 supplied with hot or tempered and cold running water in compliance with the Plumbing Code. <br />71 While the Units have cabinetry, a sink, and eletrical plug-ins for small appliances, City staff <br />72 does not consider this to be a legal kitchen given there is no connection to municipal water or <br />73 sewer. <br />74 The following additional information may be relevant for the Council’s discussion and decision: <br />75 One other Sacred Settlement exists in the metro, within the City of St. Paul at Mosaic <br />76 Community Church, 540 Wheelock Parkway East. St. Paul has adopted an interim ordinance, <br />77 directing the City’s Planning Commission to underake a zoning study to determine “whether <br />78 non-conventional residential housing product options can and should be incorporated in the <br />79 Zoning Code as a permitted residential occupany type”. While the study is undertaken, the <br />80 City is permitting the Sacred Settlementas a recreational camping area licensed by the MN <br />81 Department of Health. If the Council is interested in evaluating permananet use of these types <br />82 of Units, the City could benefit from the results of this study. <br />83 The November 2021 Phase One updates to the Zoning Code introduced a housing type called <br />84 “Dwellings, Courtyard Cottage”. The intent of this housing type was to allow dwellings units, <br />85 such as tiny homes, whereby smaller, one-family detached dwellings are arranged around a <br />86 courtyard (or shared open space) and accessed from shared driveways. While City staff is <br />87 unsure of the construction methods of the Units, buildings of a similar type could be designed <br />88 in a way to accommodate this housing type if they were constructed on a foundation, met the <br />89 Building Code, and had a connection to City sewer and water. Given the underlying zoning <br />90 of the parcel the Units currently exist on is zoned LDR, Low Density Residential, this option <br />91 could be a means for this use to comply with the Zoning Code. <br />92 Pastor Christ and Congregation President Michael Stetzler provided additional information <br />93 they requested be considered in conjunction with the appeal (Attachment F). These materials <br />94 make reference to Roseville’s Police Department’s involvement. The Police Department, <br />95 through its Housing Navigatorposition, did work with Prince of Peace to find a safe location <br />96 to park the individual’s bus while trying to secure more permenant housing. As any regulations <br />97 regarding the use of micro-unitsor tiny homes are beyond her position and duties, when the <br />98 topic was brought up the HousingNavigator informed the church they should contact the <br />99 Community Development Department to discuss the matter. Community Development was <br />100 never contacted. <br />101 If Council agrees with the staff determination that the Units are not permissible, the following options <br />102 may be consideredif the Council is interested in exploring a solution other than full compliance with <br />103 current code requirements: <br />104 Stay enforcement action for a specified period of time so as not to displace the two families <br />105 living in the Unitsand to allow for timefor the two familes to relocate to permanent housing. <br />106 Under this option, it would need to be recognized the Units are not legal dwelling units but <br />107 RV’s, as claimed by Settled. City staff is not qualified to determine what a legal RV is, <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />RS160\\1\\859178.v1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.