Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 4 <br />To help assess the viability of the proposal, staff convened a focus group of community members 71 <br />which included six individuals: two Parks and Recreation Commissioners, two community members 72 <br />who were involved with the Cedarholm Clubhouse Replacement Committee, two members of 73 <br />Roseville Golf Leagues and several who have rented the facility and participated in other public 74 <br />events at the facility. 75 <br />On Tuesday, February 28, staff hosted a meeting between the proposer and the community focus 76 <br />group. The meeting consisted of an overview of the proposal, scripted questions and follow-up or 77 <br />spontaneous questions and conversation. Much of the conversation focused on the preliminary terms 78 <br />of a potential agreement, and the proposers’ capability to handle the size and scope of the operation. 79 <br />In addition to the tangibles, during the meeting the proposers emphasized their intention to build the 80 <br />business over time through the provision of a strong product that draws in users who do not currently 81 <br />use the space, ongoing marketing, developing connections to the community, and flexibility to pivot 82 <br />as the habits and needs of the customers are learned. 83 <br />Following the presentation, each focus group member completed a rubric to score the key elements 84 <br />in the RFP (Attachment C). After submitting the scores as individuals, they gathered as a group to 85 <br />discuss the pros and cons of the proposal. In summary, the focus group was supportive of moving 86 <br />forward with the proposal and excited about the possibilities of the partnership. 87 <br />If the Council supports moving forward, staff will work with the City Attorney and proposer to 88 <br />finalize the agreement. From there, the vendor will need to begin to hire staff, apply for various 89 <br />licenses, train staff (including mandatory alcohol training), acquire supplies and product, and 90 <br />conduct other start-up machinations. 91 <br />At this time, it is anticipated that the vendor would be operational by June 1. Until that time, the city 92 <br />will continue to operate the kitchen/grill as was done last fall. 93 <br />POLICY OBJECTIVE 94 <br />The proposal is consistent with the city practice of providing the best possible service at the lowest 95 <br />cost to citizens and contracting out services where these goals can be met. 96 <br />BUDGET IMPLICATIONS 97 <br />The adopted 2023 Cedarholm Community Building budget anticipates $15,000 in revenue from the 98 <br />kitchen/grill. With the terms of this agreement, $9,000 would be received annually at minimum, plus 99 <br />4% of sales. Although the total amount of sales cannot be known, a very conservative estimate based 100 <br />on our own experience and previous vendor would be $60,000 per year, which would yield an 101 <br />additional $2,400 to the city or a total of $11,400. If the kitchen/grill grows, it is reasonable to 102 <br />anticipate revenue that would exceed this very conservative number. 103 <br /> 104 <br />RACIAL EQUITY IMPACT SUMMARY 105 <br />The proposer, Burro Loco, is a minority and women owned business. 106 <br /> 107 <br />The proposed vendor has indicated their ability to prepare food for a broad cross-section of cultural 108 <br />groups. 109