My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2023_0605
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2023
>
CC_Minutes_2023_0605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2023 3:58:09 PM
Creation date
6/21/2023 3:58:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/5/2023
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,June 5,2023 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Councilmember Groff thought this made sense, noting these are streets and alleys <br /> the City thought would be used but have not been used so the best use of the land <br /> would require the City Council to revert it to the owners so the owners have the <br /> rights to the property. <br /> Roll Call(Super Majority- 4 votes—Required) <br /> Ayes: Schroeder, Groff, Strahan, and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> b. Consider a Request to Perform an Abatement for Unresolved Violations of <br /> City Code at 2165 Victoria Street N <br /> Building Official David Englund summarized the request as detailed in the Request <br /> for Council Action of this date and noted a bench handout incorporated into the <br /> Request for Council Action providing an extract of City Council meeting minutes <br /> of June 5, 2023. <br /> Mayor Roe asked if there was a property owner or representative at the meeting. It <br /> was noted there was no one at the meeting representing the property owner. <br /> Mayor Roe asked staff if there is a meeting with the property owner on Wednesday, <br /> is there a resolution that could be worked out or what plan does staff want the <br /> Council to act on the abatement. He noted one option would be staying the <br /> enforcement until such time and asked how does staff wish the Council to approach <br /> that. <br /> Mr. Englund explained if Council felt comfortable giving staff the ability to meet <br /> with the property owner on Wednesday, if the meeting does occur, and then the <br /> Council can decide, at that point, if abatement on or after Wednesday evening <br /> would be appropriate. He indicated staff would be comfortable with that. <br /> Public Comment <br /> Mayor Roe offered an opportunity for public comment with no one coming <br /> forward. <br /> Councilmember Groff thought the City could wait a couple of days for abatement, <br /> and that staff should proceed with having the ability to enforce the abatement if a <br /> resolution is not reached on Wednesday. He thought the property owner had ample <br /> opportunity to respond to this,so he did not think that the City was doing something <br /> really quickly. He asked if the Council would have to come back and give approval <br /> for the abatement after the meeting. <br /> Mayor Roe believed the Council could give staff the discretion to extend the <br /> enforcement period through a staff action if there is an agreement with the property <br /> owner to get the issues resolved within a certain time frame. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.