Laserfiche WebLink
�'he eight municipalities with water systems were primarily those <br />bordering Minneapolis and they had a population increase of 95, d00. <br />Edina, St. Louis Park, and Robbinsdale combined population increase <br />accounted for almost half af the increase of the eight �uburban commun- <br />ities with water s}�srems. These municipalities, as well as Golumbia <br />Heights and Fridley (where substantial increases have taken pla�e), are <br />• logical extensions of rdinneapoiis develupment. The growth that <br />occurr�d in comxnunities with water systems was following the logical <br />path . <br />0 <br />Other communities which have a third or so of their population s�rved <br />by water systems do not: really indicate the true situation. In such <br />commun�ties as Cottage Grove, Blain�, Inver Gr.ove, Eagan, and Coo� <br />Ra�ids, water systems were not available to serve the development <br />that did occur. The present systems were developed concurrently with <br />th� large-scale subdivisions; such as, Thompsor�'s, Jandric's, and <br />Donnay's. Consequently, th� lacic of central water systems in any of <br />these areas uvas not an inhibiting factor to their llocating there. A <br />variety of sourc�s indicate that it was actually cl7eager in the long run <br />for these developer� to build community system�� than provide individual <br />househ�ld well�. The effect of sewage systems �or th�ir absenc� upon <br />urban development in the past is not as clear a� in the case of watep. <br />The difficulty arises �rom the fact tha�t a good m�any of the inner suburbs <br />have sewage facilities. Th�se areas, of course, were the logical pla�es <br />foi centiral city expansion. Thus, it is difficult 'to determine whether <br />the presence of sewage systems had much effect on attracting develop- <br />ment to these areas. <br />An examination of the growth in some close-in suburbs indicates that <br />appro�:imately 50 per cent �f their pop�alaiion is actually served by <br />sewers. Ev�n in an older sui�urb, such as St. Louis Park, approxi- <br />xnately 30 per �ent of the papulatior� is utilizing septic tanks., Roseville <br />has approximately 3 8 pE � c ent s e rved by s ewE rs , while Golden Valley <br />has ab��ut 58 per cent. In Bloomington sizeable population increases <br />have oc..;urred entir�ely without public sewers. Most of the large tract <br />buiid�rs in Coori Rapids , Blain� , and Cottage Grove have not provided <br />anything other ihan septi� tanks. In other areas, where presumably <br />s ewe r s we re available , d�: velopment took plac e without the builde r <br />availing himself of this facility. In recent years some developers have <br />been placing more importance upon the installation of a central sewage <br />system at the time of building as a market feature, that is, a feature <br />which the builder assumes the buyer wants and, therefore, a feature <br />which may induce a sale. <br />A final factor of particular importance from the standpoint of the <br />builder's locational decision wa� the lack of necessity for water and <br />sewage systems. Since tney also were not required or demanded by <br />lending institutions, FHA and VA, the builder was a.11owed much �reater <br />freedom in this choice of location. The house was severed from. two of <br />the most confining faciliiies that traditionall}r held it close to the exist- <br />ing urban area. It is questionable wr.eth�r some of the large tract <br />3l <br />