Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />CASE NUMBER: 1480-83 <br />APPLICANT: American Redevelopers, Inc. Page 2 <br />4. Section 9.030 of the Zoning Ordinance within the Shopping Center District <br />regulations stipulates that structures shall be setback 100 feet from a <br />contiguous residential district. That section also allows a developer to <br />submit a site plan that does not conform to the requirements, subject to <br />the review of the City Council. In this case, the spirit of the Ordinance <br />is carried out inasmuch as the building will be 100 feet from the east <br />property line. We felt it would be more appropriate, however, to keep <br />that land in the R-1 Zone so as to prohibit any further extension of the <br />building to the east, thereby protecting the residential area to the east <br />to a greater degree. <br />5. In summary then, the placement of this structure as it relates to the single <br />family area to the east and to the north, the previous approval of 1976 was <br />used as a guide placing the structure within 100 feet of the east.line, but <br />moving the structure an additional 50 feet south with respect to the north <br />line. Attached are reduced copies of the 12 sheets of drawings submitted <br />by the applicant, in addition to pertinent data relating to the development <br />proposal, traffic and parking analysis, background of the developers, and <br />financial data. <br />REZONING <br />6. The applicants have applied for an extension of the zoning an additional <br />80 feet to the east because the section maps on which the original zoning <br />were transposed for reference use show the line as scaled to be 180 feet <br />from the east property line. However, the original zoning maps place the <br />line, as explained earlier in this report, at 165 feet with that specific <br />dimension noted on the official, original zoning map. Thus, any zoning <br />action should state an extension of the zoning line easterly a distance of <br />65 feet rather than the 80 feet applied for. If the variance requested is <br />approved, reducing the setback to the zoning line on the east side to 0 <br />feet, the structure may be built as proposed. <br />FiT.ItyfiLc, <br />7. A total of 960 parking spaces are proposed of which 187 spaces will be <br />surface parking, and 773 will be accommodated in the two level parking ramp. <br />This structure will be composed of 88,800 square feet of retail space, <br />18,590 square feet of restaurants, and 27,600 square feet of theatre. <br />Section 8.150 of the Zoning Ordinance makes provisions for the joint use of <br />parking spaces wherein a 50 percent reduction is allowed for theatres and <br />restaurants, being substantially evening uses, when combined with retail <br />facilities, being substantially a daytime use. Application of this concept <br />produces a requirement of 914 spaces, whereas 960 spaces are provided. <br />These calculations in addition to other analysis of the parking requirements <br />appear on page 8 of the Parking Analysis produced by Benshoof & Associates, <br />Transportation, Planning, and Engineering Consultants. <br />