pf_01480 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE NUMBER: 1480-83 APPLICANT: American Redevelopers, Inc. Page 3 8. The Roseville Ordinance also allows for up to 50 percent of the parking to be designated as compact spaces. This concept is not being utilized in this development, inasmuch as all spaces are designed,for the normal nine foot width utilized at Rosedale and most other retail facilities in Roseville. We mention this only inasmuch as if the parking proves to be inadequate, a restriping of portions of the lot and ramp could produce substantially additional parking if needed. Your engineering staff has reviewed the parking combinations and design, confirming their adequacy. PUBLIC STREET ACCESS 9. As you know, southwesterly of the proposed structure there exists a savings and loan office and a retail building to the west. When those developments were approved, a 30 foot public street easement was obtained along the east and north sides of these properties. That was done with the intention of ultimately having a full width public street at this location, providing access to the property in question, connecting directly to the entrance to Rosedale and the opening of the median strip with County Road B-2 at that point. The current proposal includes a dedication of an additional 30 feet to complete this public street system. The drawings indicate a dedication of 29 feet on the north -south leg, and we do not know why that is designated 29 feet rather than the customary 30 feet. In any case, that would appear to be no problem. You will notice too that on that leg of the public street system, that a public sidewalk is proposed beyond the right-of-way. This can be handled by extending a sidewalk easement to cover the additional width. 10. The developers have been informed that the appropriate procedure with respect to this street is for them to petition for a public improvement project, which would result in the conduct of a feasibility study on the part of the engineering department for the construction of this full width public roadway. Pending appropriate hearings and decision by the Council, this street could then be constructed with necessary utilities and assessed to the properties benefited. It is likely in this case, that the benefitted properties already in place, would be assessed less inasmuch as they have already constructed a street facility on the public easement they have already dedicated. 11. With respect to the proposed access to the site, and the access analysis conducted by the traffic consultant, the engineering staff has reviewed the proposals and recommend that the proposed solution is appropriate and workable. DRAINAGE 12. This site is included in the City's current Tax Increment District. A benefit proposed to this property under the Tax Increment Plan is for the