My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01776
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01776
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2024 1:20:21 PM
Creation date
2/16/2024 9:33:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1776
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
417
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WOODBRIDGE PROPERTIES, CASE 21634 Page 2 <br />exposure to 35W in an efficient manner and, at the same <br />time, protecting the single-family and duplex development on <br />the east side of Cleveland near the northerly end of the <br />redevelopment area. <br />3. For approximately the past six months, Dave Weir of <br />Woodbridge Properties, with his staff and consultants have <br />been patiently putting together the properties effected. <br />There are a total of twenty-six property owners, of which <br />all but three have signed purchase agreements with <br />Woodbridge Properties. The Council's criteria for <br />considering a redevelopment of this nature would be an <br />"overwhelming majority" of the property owners willing to <br />sell compared to those who do not. In the case of the <br />Loehmans Plaza development north of Rosedale, there were <br />three property owners unwilling out of a total of seventeen <br />owners. <br />4. We are informed by the developer that the average price paid <br />for the single-family homes is equal to approximately 1.5 <br />times their "normal residential value". Thus, the land <br />values are such that each owner gets a price benefit, <br />compared to a normal sale for typical residential purposes. <br />The area of land in the three parcels not yet acquired <br />equals 141,000 square feet, equal to 6 percent of the total <br />land area. <br />5. Attached are copies of plans prepared by the applicant and a <br />statement prepared by the applicant's attorney describing <br />Lhe proposed development. <br />6. The staff has had numerous meetings with the applicant and <br />his consultants reviewing alternative site plans, building <br />configurations, traffic studies, tax increment finance data, <br />landscape concepts, building and ramp design, and impact on <br />contiguous properties. The applicants have also conducted <br />several meetings with neighbors, including owners of the <br />The <br />land and homeowners to the east of Cleveland Avenue. <br />applicants report that these meetings have gone well, <br />reflecting feedback in the design proposals. <br />7. The basic concept is one of constructing an office structure <br />at the far northerly end of the site. The existing service <br />station at the southwest corner of County Road D and <br />Cleveland would, of course, be removed. Another eight -story <br />office structure would be constructed at the south end of <br />the site, supported by a three -level parking ramp. This <br />site would be at the present location of the Garrett Truck <br />Line, which would be moved to another site and the land <br />cleared for redevelopment. The remainder of the site would <br />be developed for office/service buildings, of which each <br />would have at least 50 percent office space as required in <br />the B-4 Ordinance. These uses require a conditional use <br />permit, which should be processed with the conditional use <br />permit for the planned unit development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.