Laserfiche WebLink
THE LINCOLN COMPANIES, CASE 1675 <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />frequent such a store. Your staff suggests that women <br />good (or are perhaps Bette r)more nmen adequaterparkingnspacest <br />customers simply appreciate <br />The planned extension of a public street, west from Snelling Avenue <br />(north of Midway Ford), south of the new Lido Restaurant site, to the <br />old Glendenning Truck Terminal site (now owned by the Space Center) <br />This <br />Inc.) is a critical element in the development at under this site. <br />to <br />roadway is proposed in the preliminary p <br />extend southerly along the east boundary thine of the <br />of the property <br />and and <br />question to County Road C. This opens up uestion as the proposed new <br />makes it practical to develop the site in q <br />shopping center. <br />Krank <br />Attached is a statement from the applicant's no'f BeVe�e sheetsrso skdrawings <br />Erickson Architects with reduced copies lan, exterior <br />illustrating the site plan, drainage plan, landscape p <br />elevations, and floor plans of the proposed shopping center structure. <br />Department of Transportation proposes <br />As you are all aware, the State them for a future construction <br />to release the right-of-way acquired by This means <br />of an interchange at Count�hR service aroad i andnd g Avenue. Snelling Avenue, at the <br />that the property between <br />northwest corner of County Road C and Snelliho� Avenue <br />nt , Minill be <br />released to its original owners whom, according <br />ta <br />Law, have the first option to repurchase the land at its market value. <br />This suggests the possibility of changes in the service road that have <br />possibilityof eliminating <br />the on the frontage eat <br />roadalready been constructed or <br />the <br />roadway to be <br />road in favor of the prop evolve <br />side of the property in question. Such changes, however, may <br />over a period of •timT rdenadti�he Cityff of t Flo evlllee e and require the c <br />part of contiguous property owners, MN/DU , � applicants site plan, suggests that <br />The proposal, as illustrated on the 99 <br />rth/south roadway it <br />d be <br />the intersection of the new nosthe a <br />opinion ofyour <br />located 300 feet north of County Road C. <br />It staff that the geometric design of this intersect °ilassumng t some <br />there may be other solutions that areappropriate, <br />ment of the service <br />mutually acceptable change in the existing service road, as constructed, <br />road. You must keep in mind that the <br />was for the purpose of being a permanent portion of an interchange at <br />Snelling and County Road C. The alignment is not necessarily the best <br />for the development of the properties without the interchange. <br />applicants have retained the services of a well -qualified BTed inra fic <br />the <br />The PP that of Strgar-•Roscoe-Fausch, Inc , <br />engineering firm, configurations for the <br />process of conducting an analysis of alternative <br />ono t north/south road on <br />intersection of the service road and <br />uestion.proWe believe, however, that <br />the east side of the property in q <br />the ultimate geometric design of this intersection <br />should l Of the ghee Plan, <br />e a <br />decision regarding the ultimate land use pP geometric <br />the latter of which can be readily adapted to a variety of g <br />designs for the intersection Itself. <br />Page 2 <br />drivers are as <br />discriminating <br />