pf_01575 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Other financial aid requested is the waiving of the $5,000 legal fee of the city attorneys in the condemnation offer and settlement activities. Although originally discussed with the developers as a it is now the staffs it aid to the development, position that the city not participate in this expense. Tho developer had requested the c1ty to provide significant additional financial assistance. This was in the form of removing or relocating all the structures that exist on the site. This $90,000 would have increased the city assistance to $568,000. The developer was informed that if the city did become involved in the housing relocation, or potentially other such items of assistance, that a developers agreement would be required. TANURB now concludes that they do not want a development agreement and withdrew their request on the homes. The council thus has several difficult decisions to make concerning this development. If there i:a confidence that the remaining items will be available in tiro for staff review and comment before the requested January 2, 1985 Planning Commission hearing, then the referral could be made. This, of course, also assumes at resolution on the level and fora of city funding assistance being resolved prior to the hearing date. If not, the matter should be continued to the Janujjry 14, 1985 council tooting. This would provide the developer additional t'amc to better eompleto the submiasions material and r0sOlV0 staff concorn.n. Ploasc note that thi would cause the item to bo hoard at the February 1985 is Planning Cotaaiasion hearinf, and at tho Fcbt•uary 11, 1985 council hearing. This Fe the y 15 p1985.lc data to maot the developers DL atod, declsion deadline of February 15, 1985. Ra,;ardloss of the final Mature of then al►plications council to i the it is vary dcasirAble for is ttdlcatc it:a pt lft it:arY dcaire on handling the wall for tlae Pend and percentage of assosat=tant on Fairviaw.