My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01665
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1600-1699
>
pf_01665
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/20/2024 11:51:32 AM
Creation date
2/20/2024 11:48:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1664
Planning Files - Type
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 2- <br />6. Nordby. Ken. Nordby was in to discuss the parking arrangements for <br />the Ole Mexico Restaurant on Lexington Avenue. They propose to expand <br />the restaurant and expand parking to serve it to an appropriate degree <br />on the vacant land west of Lexington Avenue (across from the restaurant <br />site). We asked Mr. Nordby to prepare a plan showing the square footage <br />of the uses in the shopping center and the available parking so that the <br />proper amount of parking can be calculated for the new lot to be constructed <br />across the street. <br />7. Bever. Robert Bever was in to discuss a variance to a garage setback for <br />his residential lot on South McCarrons Boulevard. He proposes a garage which <br />would be 20 feet from the right-of-way rather than the required 30. We <br />reviewed the minor variance requirements, including the necessity of the <br />contiguous property owners approval. Doug Strong tells us this week that one <br />of the property owners wok'.d not sign, and therefore, Mr. Bever may elect to <br />process the variance to the Planning Commission and Council. Withoug effected <br />property owner's approval, we, of course, cannot process the variance as a <br />minor variance. <br />S. Lee. Mrs. Gerald Lee who lives at 2212 Marion Road is keeping a total of <br />dogs on her property, three of which belong to other persons. 'Into of <br />the dogs recently got loose and were picked up by the police and so she was <br />informed that having four dogs on the property constitutes a "dog kennel". <br />We suggested she find another place to board the extra dogs, inasmuch as the <br />ordinance is clear in allowing a total of two adult dogs on a single family <br />premise. <br />9. Schneider. Jim Schneider is an attorney representing Robert Bigelbach who <br />lives at 387 West Eldridge. Mr. Bigelbach purchased this house and 155 feet <br />of the lot to the north of his property back in 1966. This division of land <br />was not approved by the City, and he proposes to request this approval at.U-ds <br />time. There are some complications here inasmuch as the lot has a depth of <br />only 71 feet (off Western Avenue). This will likely be submitted to be <br />processed at the Decenber meeting of the Planning Commission. <br />10. rbrawski. John Morawski bought the old Burger homestead at 1994 Lexington <br />Avenue North. This lot is 160 feet deep with the house set well back to <br />the rear of the property (98 feet back from Lexington Avenue). Fie proposed <br />to build a garage 66 feet back which wiluire a minor variance requirement <br />that a garage not be placed in the front r' The garage will be 20 x 22 feet <br />rla- and appears to us to be proposed for a logical location on this site. <br />This will then be processed as a minor variance. <br />11. Scott. Stave Scott will be the manager of the nc;%, restaurant recently <br />approved at MinnE-,ot-a and Rice Street (to t)e called Roseville Crossing) . We <br />reviewed the reuse of the existing sign that was set up for Grandma Lees. <br />There will be a single pylon within the 100 square foot maximum requirements. <br />12, Schlenker. Cliff Schlenker who owns Rose Carburetor Se. ---vice at Fernwood, <br />just north of Larpenteur, was in to discuss the placement of a new pylon sign <br />for his business. We suggested a simpiler sign than he proposed, and recommended <br />he place it 30 feet back as required by ordinance. This site, you will recall, <br />was approved for an addition and additional parking development recently by <br />the Planning Commission and Council. He has not been able to do this work, <br />however, as he has not been able to change the easement which is on the site on the <br />north portion of his land. The easement runs to private property to the west <br />of him. In any case, he proposes to construct a sign, which we have recommended <br />that he try to place in accordance with the ordinance without see].i g any <br />variances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.