My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01787
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1700-1799
>
pf_01787
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 12:15:36 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 12:07:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1787
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
289
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
}. <br />July 1, 1987 <br />!v <br />TO: Jim Andre <br />FROM: Craig Waldron <br />SUBJECT: LEXINGTON SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT <br />CC: Bob Bierscheid <br />Dahlgren, Bierscheid, and I met with the Lexington School developers <br />today, July 1, 1987. The following transpired during the course <br />of the meeting.. <br />1. The developers are proposing a new building which will be <br />essentially in the center of the property, somewhat closer to <br />Lexington, with a parking lot adjacent to the property owners. <br />An enhanced buffer would be placed adjacent to the property <br />owners to the south. <br />2. The plan depicts the ten percent dedication to the City, pur- <br />portedly at-$100,000 cost to the developer. The remaining area <br />needed for the park is approximately 45,850 feet. The developer <br />is tentatively offering this land to the City at the price of <br />$125,000. It was stated that the cost was originally $150,000, <br />based on the value of the sites for potential duplex develop- <br />ment. Thus, the developer is supposedly discounting the property <br />by $25,000. This works out to a cost to the City, per square <br />foot, of $2.73. <br />3. It was determined that the layout is essentially workable, <br />with the contingency that appropriate parking be made available <br />for the ball field. <br />We stated that the price, based on potential duplex value, is <br />simply too steep. The developer will be moving forward to meet <br />all of the planning requirements for the August Planning Commis- <br />sion and City Council meetings. A formal purchase price will be <br />submitted to the City for the ballpark land as soon as it is <br />refined and finalized. <br />In my opinion, at this point in time, it is critical that the <br />City establish an internal working number with respect to the <br />bottom line that we are willing to pay for the 45,850 square <br />feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.