Laserfiche WebLink
SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL <br />PAGE 2 <br />4. The three driveways along Longl;akc- Road have been reduced to <br />two. <br />5. The high elevation of the parking area along the south side has <br />been lowered, eliminating the deleterious grade condition. The <br />garage doors serving the entire center no longer are contiguous to <br />the drive -up lane parallel to the front of the structure. <br />4. No changes have been made on the specific site plan to mitigate the <br />City's other major concerns. Still there remains the more important <br />issue of the appropriateness of the land use in this vital area of the <br />City, soon to be more appropriate for more intensive development, due <br />in part to the City's significant investment in the construction of a new <br />bridge across 35 W linking this area to County Road B-2 LO the east. <br />5. As noted in the first paragraph in our last month's report, we <br />anticipated that this property and others near it would remain in their <br />current. use for an extended period of time, while raw land (unoccupied) <br />south of the proposed bridge alignment would be redeveloped for high <br />density office and hotel use. Through conversations with owners of the <br />land at the time of the initial formation of the Tax Increment District, <br />we were advised of their desire to stay there as long as possible and <br />operate one of the better and newer tracking facilities in the area. <br />We are informed now, however, that the owners desire to sell the <br />property as quickly as possible, thereby creating a timing concern for <br />the City with respect to its, ultimate appropriate potential for the site. <br />6. We have discussed possible ultimate uses with the applicant Mr. Vanasse. <br />He notes that the approximate cost of the structure proposed for the <br />Price Savers warehouse is twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per square foot <br />for approximately 107,000 square feet of building. The site is proposed <br />to accommodate approximately 750 automobiles. At the ordinance <br />required rate of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of office structure, that <br />capacity of parking space would accommodate approximately 150,000 <br />:,-quare feet of office space. We agree that such a building might be <br />built for approximately seventy-five dollars ($7500)This simple analysis indicates an approximate valuation. <br />a ua�tion ofr the fare oot. <br />structure of $2,675,000.00 versus an office structure of $11,250,000.00. <br />That, then, is a magnitude of difference in the potential intensity of <br />development based on parking capacity, without a ramp, which ultimately <br />controls the land use intensity. <br />7. What the City needs at this time, is time to consider the implications <br />and alternatives relating to the potential land use. Specifically the City <br />needs time to consider its options. As reviewed with the City's <br />Economic Development Director, Craig Waldron, these options include, <br />the need to: <br />1. Review its development options in the area with the respect to <br />financial implications, pax revenues, spin-off development, property <br />values, and job creation ramifications. <br />2. Study possible rezoning of the are for more appropriate, <br />efficient and intensive use. <br />