My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01650
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1600-1699
>
pf_01650
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2024 1:18:35 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 3:23:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1650
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
356
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TKDATOLTZ, <br />KING. DUVALL, ANDERSON <br />AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED <br />ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS <br />1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA <br />444 CEDAR STREET <br />SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101-2140 <br />PHONE:61M2-4400 FAX:612/202.0083 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />To: Don Ericksen, Dan Stoltz <br />Copies To: Michael Falk, Wes Hendrickson <br />Arne Hedberg — <br />From: Rich Gray <br />Date: September 15. 1995 <br />Reference: Northwestem College <br />On -Site Meeting_ <br />Re: PUD Related Issues <br />Commission No.10438 <br />At J 0:00 A.M. on Wednesday, September 13, 1995, representatives from Northwestem College, <br />(lie City of Roseville, Rice Creek Watershed District, Kraus Anderson Construction, TKDA and <br />adjacent property owners met at Northwestern College to discuss issues concerning construction <br />of the new Physical Education Building relative to the approved 1986 Campus PUD. Following <br />is a summary of items discussed: <br />1. "How does the current building compare in size and location to the building proposed in <br />the 1986 PUD?" The back (Lakeside) of the current building is located in approximately <br />the same location as was proposed in 1986. The height is believed to be about the same <br />also. The current footprint is much smaller. TKDA will compare current plans with past <br />plans to verify this. Of particular concern is the height of the building on the lake side and <br />its relationship to the top of the trees at the top of the hillside. <br />2. The City suggested that same -scale models of the current building and the 1986 building be <br />presented at the City Council Meeting to facilitate comparisons. <br />3. Dale Eklin of the Rice Creek Watershed District reviewed their concerns: <br />a. The issues surrounding the holding pond near Bumson Research Center (this is a <br />different pond than the pond just north of the Physical Education Building) have <br />been resolved and the Watershed District has been satisfied. <br />b. The smaller washouts along the hillside facing Little Johanna Lake shonld start to <br />stabilize themselves now that the storm water runoff from above is being directed <br />away from the hillside and controlled through the new storm water ponding <br />system. It would be best to minimize disturbances to these areas, i.e. don't try to <br />fill these areas using heavy equipment. College staff will add some rock by hand <br />to thes,_ areas. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.