My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01605
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1600-1699
>
pf_01605
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2024 4:18:27 PM
Creation date
2/21/2024 4:18:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1605
Planning Files - Type
Variance
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
smith <br />ARCHITECTS <br />TO: City of Roseville Planning Staff <br />FROM: Steven A. JenLen <br />DATE: July 2, 1985 <br />RE: Development Proposal for 171 Center Street <br />The following are concerns that have been expressed regarding <br />the residential development of 171 Center Street. <br />1. Character: There was a fear that the earlier proposals would not <br />"fit in" with the existing neighborhood housing. The original <br />proposals were for large, two story contemporary style houses. <br />We are now proposing smaller 1� story traditional bungalows with <br />low pitched roofs. We feel this is more appropriate to the <br />character of the neighborhood. <br />2. Hem: The original proposal called for a two story house <br />with a height of 30 0". A second proposal was offered as a <br />two story house with a height of 28'0". We are now proposing a <br />story and one half bungalow with a height of approximately <br />20'0" above finished grade. <br />3. Traffic an____ d the Cam► Drive: It was determined that a <br />community drive is appropriate for this project for several <br />reasons. The foremost is that the community drive is a method <br />of limiting the destruction of the existing landscape and vegetation. <br />The neighbor to the north objected to the community drive being <br />adjacent to his property. Several proposals were developed to <br />improve this situation; <br />a) The driveway was moved from 5 feet to 10 feet south of <br />the property line. <br />b) The driveway was lowered below existing grade and a berm <br />was constructed to the north of the drive. This berm was <br />heavily landscaped to further shield the neighbor to the north. <br />c) The entrance to the driveway was shifted to the south away from <br />the neighbor's parking area to further isolate the traffic. <br />6215 CAMBRIDGE STREET MINNEAPOLIS MINNESOIA 55416 612 925 3788 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.