My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_01559
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF1000 - PF1999
>
1500-1599
>
pf_01559
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/22/2024 8:58:31 AM
Creation date
2/22/2024 8:57:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
1559
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE NUMBER: 1559-84 Page 3 <br />APPLICANT: First Grand Avenue Liquors <br />easterly side of the property. The Planning Commission and Council may <br />wish to consider a condition that the revised landscape plan be subject <br />to approval of the staff. <br />11. The sketch also indicates tLat brick on the exterior of the building is <br />indicated as an alternative. Inasmuch as there are relatively few liquor <br />licenses to be issued in the City for off -sale purposes, it would appear <br />to be in the City's and the public's interest that such sites retail d <br />structures so approved be of reasonable quality. Most rece <br />nt structures in Roseville have been constructed of brick, which is not <br />considered an excessively expensive exterior treatment method these <br />days. <br />12. In the past few weeks, the staff has discussed various property <br />development proposals for this site for a number of potential users. One <br />of them was for a restaurant. If a restaurant is proposed for a portion <br />of the remainder of the building, the parking will be grossly inadequate. <br />Whereas retail structures (including an off -sale liquor store) require <br />five spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of building, a restaurant <br />requires 12 spaces per 1,000, or one space for each 2.8 seats, whichever <br />is greater. Thus, the Planning Commission and Council may wish to <br />question the applicant regarding the potential use of the remainder of <br />the structure. <br />13. Pending the outcome of the required additional dedication for <br />right-of-way purposes along County Road D, the proposal has merit <br />inasmuch as it provides a means for considerably upgrading the appearance <br />and function of the site. Though we reviewed various development concepts <br />for the site in the recent past, we have not had an opportunity to review <br />the proposal under consideration with the applicant. The Planning <br />Commission and Council may wish to consider approval with appropriate <br />conditions or referral back to the staff for more definitive details <br />covering the subjects of concern expressed herein. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.