Laserfiche WebLink
Community Advisory Group <br />The Community AdvisoryGroup (CAG) was a group of 12 communityvolunteers from various backgrounds, <br />including city boards and commissions, community organizations, residents, and businesses. The role of <br />the CAG was to participate in a series of workshops to advise the projectteam on community engagement <br />strategies, provide insights on key themes, help develop findings, and help promote the project with <br />the community segments they represent. During phase 1, the CAGjoined a visioning workshop to help <br />identify priority community segments as part of an equity analysis.They also participated in a visioning <br />activity which set the foundation for the themes and outcomes for the project and was used to guide <br />phase 1 community engagement activities. <br />Phase 1 community partnerships <br />Community engagement efforts were designed to prioritize strategies that reach communities whose <br />voices are typically underrepresented in the public processes such as communities of color, people <br />with low wealth, people with disabilities, foreign -born residents, older adults, youth and renters. This <br />was done to ensure all voices were represented in the process and notjust those who have the most <br />familiarity with public processes. <br />A key to this strategy was to partner with the community organizations, neighborhood groups, and service <br />providers thatserve these communities in order to reach people in the places they already go.To begin <br />this effort, the team conducted desktop research to identify potential community partners and made <br />initial contactwith more than twodozen groups. Contacts included an email introduction, followed by a <br />phone call, and in some cases a sitevisit. Community groups were provided a project overview, asked to <br />share inputon the community aspirations from the perspective of their organization, and encouraged to <br />share project promotional material with their networks during both phase 1 and phase 2 of the project. <br />Of these, eight organizations agreed to participate in listening sessions or other engagement events with <br />the projectteam. Specific community partners and the communities they serve are listed in Figure 3. At <br />each event, participants were asked to self -identify their demographics which are presented in Figure <br />4, along with the demographic profile from the online surveyform. <br />Figure2: Project timeline � <br />N <br />N <br />O <br />N <br />M <br />N <br />O <br />N <br />- - - " START UP <br />• Develop a work plan <br />• Prepare engagement <br />material <br />• Coordinate schedules <br />- PHASE 1 <br />COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT <br />• Identify communityvision <br />• Develop aspirations and <br />' outcomes <br />- PHASE 2 <br />COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT <br />• Reviewvision and aspirations <br />' • Prioritize outcomes <br />- - - RESULTS <br />• Share the community <br />input collected and vet <br />conclusions <br />• Present community vision <br />and celebrate! <br />FNVISION4bR0SEVILLEISummaryReport <br />Page 54 of 140 <br />