My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-06-25_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024-06-25_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2024 9:13:29 AM
Creation date
7/24/2024 9:12:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/25/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Vice Chair Hodder indicated he would be at the meeting. <br />Member Mueller indicated she had a conflict and would not be there. <br />Member Cicha indicated he was not sure yet if he would be able to attend the <br />meeting. <br />Chair Ficek indicated he could make a presentation for the Council. <br />Chair Ficek asked the Commission what they feel is the value of being on the <br />Commission and how can that be expressed to the City Council. He also thought <br />what is important to discuss with the City Council from the rubric is what would <br />be next for the PWETC, what are the important things the City Council is hearing <br />and where does the Commission go from there. <br />Member Mueller thought that was a great idea She indicated she was trying to tie <br />this back to when Mayor Roe came and talked to the Commission and what <br />direction is the Council going with the Commission. It seems like the Council is <br />trying to better define the entire purpose of the Commissions. <br />Chair Ficek thought that was a part of it and that the Commission needed <br />direction. He was trying to think about more of the experience and value. What <br />do the Commissioners see as value by being on the Commission? He indicated he <br />has enjoyed learning more about the City while being on the Commission with the <br />tours and other topics discussed. Being able to bring that information to his <br />neighbors and other residents in the community. There is a tangible benefit he <br />feels with being involved. He thought it would be interesting for the <br />Commissioners to be at the joint meeting and tell the Council what they saw as <br />being valuable and what had been learned on the Commission. <br />Vice Chair Hodder indicated to him; that it gets to the mission of the <br />Commission. All of the different facets of what the Commission does and all of <br />the things that people do not see. To him, that is what is important. <br />Chair Ficek thought with only four members being at the meeting, he wondered if <br />questions could be sent to the Commissioners to get answers back to staff to <br />provide an update to him to present at the joint meeting. <br />Member Mueller thought that was a good point because the Commission could <br />provide an update on high-level topics the Commission has reviewed over the past <br />year, but the City Council already has that information. She thought Chair <br />Ficek's idea would bring another layer to this. She would also like to point out <br />how wonderful the staff was because City staff always bring so much to the <br />Commission and show what is happening throughout the City with the pillars that <br />Page 5 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.