Laserfiche WebLink
o Informal <br />o Statistically valid survey <br />2011 Assessment Data <br /> 26 questions <br /> 3,000 survey’s mailed – 760 returned <br />o Follow-up phone calls <br />o Phone option <br /> Gauged support for the System Master Plan <br /> Sample questions included: park use, facility use, support for park/athletic facility <br />improvements <br />2024 City of Roseville Community Survey Data <br /> 400 random samples of City of Roseville households <br /> Telephone interview <br /> Average interview time of 17 minutes <br /> Non-response level of 5.5 <br /> City household sample projectable with +/- 5.0% in 95 out of 100 cases <br />o Parks and Recreation results <br /> 94% rate city park facilities as excellent or good <br /> Trails are used more often than neighborhood parks <br /> 93% rate the upkeep and maintenance of parks as excellent or good <br /> 34% of community participated in a Parks and Recreation program within <br />the last year <br /> 96% of those who participated were satisfied with experience <br /> 2/3 of the community use city trails and pathways at least once a month <br /> 95% responded that city facilities meet their needs <br /> 70% responded that the city has an appropriate amount of parks and open <br />spaces (17% too little, 14% too many) <br /> 67% responded that the city has an appropriate amount of trails and <br />bikeways (19% too little, 13% too many) <br />Envision Roseville Data <br /> 2,400 engagements <br />Interactive maps <br />Qualitative info <br />Next Steps <br /> Pull together available data to determine future needs and questions to ask <br /> Identify tangible goals for the study <br />Consider methodology <br />Develop a report and uses <br /> Timeline <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />