My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024_0924_PWETC_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Agendas and Packets
>
202x
>
2024
>
2024_0924_PWETC_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2024 11:56:55 AM
Creation date
9/25/2024 11:42:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/24/2024
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
185
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 2 <br />Proposal Evaluation Criteria <br />Minimum Qualifications <br />Relevant experience, references and capacity <br />Pass/Fail <br />Category <br />Weight <br />Project Capability <br />30% <br />How Well Proposal Meets Community Values: <br />Equity <br />10% <br />Other community values elements <br />10% <br />Price* <br />40% <br />Past Performance (e.g., Survey of other Cities) <br />5% <br />Value -Added Plan <br />5% <br />Total <br />100% <br />Notes: <br />* The City will use the following formula to score the proposed price: <br />Lowest proposed total annual cost estimate divided by Respondent's price multiplied by the maximum score <br />of 40 points. <br />The review committee will evaluate all proposals submitted based on the criteria in Table 2. Finalists may, <br />at the sole discretion of the City, be invited to interviews. At the interview, Respondents will be asked to <br />respond to questions regarding their proposal. These questions may include further explanation on: <br />♦ How their proposal will meet community values; <br />♦ How their proposed value-added plan will work in practice; and/or <br />♦ Other questions deemed relevant to evaluating the proposals. <br />The review committee will present its recommendation to the City Council at the October 7, 2024, City <br />Council meeting. <br />4.5 Proposals May Be Rejected in Whole or Part <br />The City reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to: <br />♦ Reject any or all proposals. <br />♦ Reject parts of proposals. <br />♦ Negotiate modifications of proposals submitted. <br />♦ Accept part or all of the proposals on the basis of consideration(s) other than proceeds or cost. <br />♦ Negotiate specific work elements with the preferred Respondent into a contract of lesser or <br />greater expense than described in this RFP or the Respondent's reply. <br />4.6 Respondents May Team with Other Companies <br />It is recognized that some prospective Respondents may wish to subcontract with other companies for <br />processing services. This may be allowed, as needed, but all such Contractor -Subcontractor relationships <br />must be explicitly described in each proposal scenario. The City will contract with only one primary <br />Contractor for the recycling services. The City expects to have one designated point of contact with the <br />selected Contractor. <br />RFP for City of Roseville Recycling Services . 7 <br />Page 63 of 185 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.