CCP 09232024 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

40 immediate proximity of this site to the abutting LMDR and Institutional zoning districts, as well as the 41 High Density Residential district across the street, The Planning Commission concurred with staff's 42 analysis that it would be inappropriate to rezone this one parcel to become a lone LDR-zoned property 43 among the three other more intensive zoning districts and recommended rezoning the property to the 44 LMDR district. 45 46 Preliminary Plat 47 The proposed lot is 120 feet wide and slightly more than 165 feet deep, which is a little less than half an 48 acre in area. Because the LMDR district requires a minimum density of five dwellings per acre and a 49 maximum of eight dwellings per acre, the proposed lot could accommodate between 2.3 dwellings and 50 3.6 dwellings. Although specific development plans are not part of this application because the applicant 51 does not intend to be the developer, the proposed lot has enough width and area to accommodate a 52 variety of possible residential development types within the LMDR zoning district. The Planning 53 Commission recommended approval of the proposed preliminary plat, with typical conditions related to 54 storm water management and park dedication. 55 56 Public Comment 57 The public hearing for this application was held by the Planning Commission on September 4, 2024. 58 Draft minutes of the public hearing, emails from the public received by Planning Division staff, memos 59 from members of Roseville's Development Review Committee, and the summary of the developer's 60 open house meeting are included as Attachment 2. In light of the concerns expressed regarding the 61 potential impacts of the proposal on the pond on the church property, staff would like to clarify that this is 62 not a natural pond, but it is a storm water pond built concurrently with the construction of the church in 63 the early 1990s. 64 65 Policy Objectives 66 Establish publicprivate partnerships to ensure lifecycle housing throughout that City attracts 67 and retains a diverse mix of people, family types, economic statuses, ages, and so on. 68 Explore opportunities to encourage smaller housing units, “nontraditional” housing development 69(which could include culturallyappropriate housing to reflect the population demographics of the 70 City), and opportunities to address the lack of housing in the “missing middle”. 71 72 73 Equity Impact Summary 74 The policy choice posed by the current application is whether to change the future land use and zoning 75 maps to enable development of new "missing-middle" housing on the subject property. The high cost of 76 housing disproportionately affects communities of color and households with low or fixed incomes, and 77 increasing the supply of new housing at any size or price can help relieve the market pressure driving up 78 housing costs. Even if new dwellings built on the subject property do not meet the technical parameters 79 to be considered 'affordable', per se, missing-middle housing is less costly than comparable housing 80 built as detached homes on larger lots. 81 82 Budget Implications 83 Receipt of park dedication funds commensurate with the number of new dwelling units developed on the 84 proposed new parcel 85 86 Staff Recommendations 87 Planning Division staff recommends three actions. 88 1. Adopt a resolution approving the proposed amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan 89 Future Land Use Map re-guiding the western 120 feet of the subject property from Institutional 90 land uses to Low Density Residential land uses, based on the content of this RCA, public input, 91 and City Council deliberation. Page 2 of 4 Qbhf!6!pg!345