Laserfiche WebLink
<br />28 <br />29 <br />30 The key components of the Base Proposal that will be included in the overall discussion <br />31 are: <br />32 Cart Ownership: Contractors provided costs for both City-owned and Contractor- <br />33 owned carts (currently contractor-owned). <br />34 o Two provided both options, two provided only the City-owned option. <br />35 Term of contract: Contractors provided costs for 3-year and 5-year contract terms. <br />36 o Two provided both options, two provided only the 5-year option. <br />37 Revenue Share: No revenue share was provided in the Base Proposal. <br />38 Recycling service in Parks: Contractors responded with pricing for individual cart <br />39 pick up in parking lots, walk service to buildings and drive up service to bins along <br />40 trails in Parks. <br />41 Zero Waste Events: Contractors’ pricing included Zero Waste Events support: Taste <br />42 of Rosefest, Run-and-Roll, Earth Day, and the Wild Rice Festival. Two events added <br />43 to the RFP were Juneteenth and Tapped & Uncorked. <br />44 Service Level: Contractors provided bi-weekly servicing of single dwelling units, and <br />45 weekly servicing of multi dwelling units as part of the Base Proposal. <br />46 <br />47 The key components in the Alternate Proposal that will be included in the overall discussion <br />48 are: <br />49 Revenue Share: No contractor provided a revenue share option. <br />50 Service Level: One contractor provided an alternate collection schedule. <br />51 <br />52 All materials leading up to the Council meeting will reference the Contractors as “Proposer <br />53 1,” “Proposer 2,” and so on. At the meeting we will match the contractors with their scores. <br />54 <br />55 Below is the scoring of the Base Proposals based on the lowest average annual cost to the <br />56 City. The final scores can vary based on the options included in the overall contract, <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Qbhf!77!pg!6:7 <br /> <br />