CCP 01222026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

38 12.Prohibit masked or unidentified law enforcement activity within city limits, requiring visible name 39 and agency identification for any enforcement action, and mandating disengagement where this 40 standard is violated (Citizen Petition) 41 13.Bar the use of city-owned property, facilities, vehicles, and resources for ICE operations, 42 including terminating or refusing leases and access agreements (Citizen Petition) 43 14.Cancel city contracts and funding streams that support immigration detention, transport, or 44 surveillance, and deny permits for new or expanded detention facilities (Citizen Petition) 45 15.Enact strict city data-privacy rules barring the sharing or purchase of warrantless location, 46 biometric, or surveillance data, and prohibiting data broker access. (Citizen Petition) 47 16.Direct the City Attorney and relevant departments to investigate ICE-related misconduct and 48 enforce all applicable municipal laws, including nuisance, trespass, and public safety violations 49(Citizen Petition) 50 17.Convene public oversight hearings to create a full public record of ICE activity and city 51 involvement (Citizen Petition) 52 Discussion 53 Below is a discussion of each item and potential policy/ordinance considerations for the City Council to 54 consider: 55 56 Consider amendments to or creation of new policies and/or ordinances to limit as much as 57 possible DHS, ICE and associated agencies use of city property, staff and data (Councilmember 58 Bauer) 59 60 No use of any Roseville resources for support of ICE, to include transport, cameras, city data, 61 funds, real time data requests, or information about immigration status. No city staff, including 62 Roseville Police, are allowed to participate in civil immigration enforcement. (Councilmember 63 Strahan) 64 Since 2017, the City has had in place Roseville Police Department (RPD) Policy 413 regarding 65 immigration enforcement. The policy states that the Roseville Police Department does not undertake 66 immigration enforcement and will at no time ask for a person’s immigration status unless it is part of a 67 criminal investigation. In addition, in 2017, the City Council passed resolution #14434 that dictated that 68 this policy cannot be changed unless with City Council approval. 69 70 Staff has reviewed the existing policy and have suggested changes to the policy to better strengthen and 71 clarify the Roseville Police Department’s policy regarding immigration enforcement. 72 73 Presently, there are no other policies or ordinances that govern the use of external agencies regarding 74 the use of city property, staff, and data. For the City Council’s consideration, staff has drafted a 75 proposed resolution and “Use of City Resources” ordinance to address those items (Attachments 3-5). 76 The resolution and ordinance should be considered together as the resolution provides background on 77 the need for the ordinance. The resolution affirms the lawful and appropriate use of city resources. 78 79 Specifically, the draft language in the ordinance would: 80 Clarify the use of city personnel and resources related to the enforcement of federal immigration 81 laws 82 State that no federal, state, or local government entity is authorized to be on any city-owned 83 parking lot as staging area, operations base in enforcing federal immigration law without 84 permission 85 Require reporting by any city employee who has an interaction with a representative of the 86 Department of Homeland Security 87 All interactions between city staff and DHS/ICE must be documented, publicly disclosed, and are 88 subject to City Council oversight. (Councilmember Strahan) 89 As part of the proposed ordinance, staff will be required to document information about that interaction. 90 This information will be shared with the City Council and the public on a regular and as-needed basis. Page 2 of 7 Qbhf!4!pg!269