CCP 01222026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

203 204 Bar the use of city-owned property, facilities, vehicles, and resources for ICE operations, 205 including terminating or refusing leases and access agreements (Citizen Petition) 206 This is addressed earlier in the report. 207 208 Cancel city contracts and funding streams that support immigration detention, transport, or 209 surveillance, and deny permits for new or expanded detention facilities (Citizen Petition) 210 The City of Roseville does not own, operate, or contract for detention facilities that support immigration 211 detention, support, or surveillance. The Roseville Zoning Code does not allow for detention centers to 212 be in the City of Roseville. 213 214 Enact strict city data-privacy rules barring the sharing or purchase of warrantless location, 215 biometric, or surveillance data, and prohibiting data broker access. (Citizen Petition) 216 The draft “Use of City Resources” ordinance addresses these concerns and ensures that any 217 information the City has pertaining to a person’s citizenship status is not shared or able to be 218 accessed/purchased by third parties unless required by the Minnesota and federal data practices 219 laws. Regarding the license plate readers, RPD Policy 420 Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) 220\[Attachment 10\] has been strengthened to explicitly state that ALPR data cannot be used or shared for 221 immigration matters or with ICE. 222 223 Direct the City Attorney and relevant departments to investigate ICE-related misconduct and 224 enforce all applicable municipal laws, including nuisance, trespass, and public safety violations 225(Citizen Petition) 226 This is addressed earlier in the report. 227 228 Convene public oversight hearings to create a full public record of ICE activity and city 229 involvement (Citizen Petition) 230 The City does not have jurisdiction for oversight of state or federal government and therefore is not able 231 undertake such action 232 233 Other Policy Considerations 234 City Statement on recent immigration enforcement activities 235 The City Council may want to draft and release a statement from the City Council. Based on City 236 Council direction, the Mayor and City Manager can draft a statement for release. 237 238 Cities of St. Paul, Minneapolis, and State of Minnesota Lawsuit against the Federal Government to 239 challenge the ongoing Operation Metro Surge immigration enforcement actions. 240 On January 12, 2026, the State of Minnesota and Cities of St. Paul and Minneapolis filed a lawsuit 241 against the federal government. The lawsuit includes the entire state of Minnesota, so all cities are 242 covered by the lawsuit. The City Attorney and her firm are reviewing what needs to be done to join the 243 lawsuit if that is the desire of the City Council. 244 245 Federal retaliatory actions against the State of Minnesota 246 President Trump has announced plans to cut funding to sanctuary cities starting Feb. 1, 2026. The 247 White House has classified Minnesota as a Sanctuary State. At this point, it is unclear what type of 248 funding would potentially be cut and what, if any, impact the federal funding cuts would have for 249 Minnesota cities. (Minneapolis and St. Paul have been identified as sanctuary cities and would most 250 likely be impacted by federal cuts). 251 252 As the Council is aware, the City was recently awarded nearly $4.5 million in federal grants for our fire 253 and police departments. We have also received federal grant funds for our embedded social 254 workers. There are also state grants that we have received whose funding source are federal funds. 255 256 The reality of losing such federal funds due to action by the City is unknown. Any policy choices by the 257 City should be carefully weighed with the possibility of losing federal funds. 258 Page 5 of 7 Qbhf!7!pg!269