My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1972_0314
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
197x
>
1972
>
CC_Minutes_1972_0314
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:53:53 AM
Creation date
2/1/2005 1:07:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/14/1972
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Improvement ST-71-8 <br /> <br />village Manager Raymond presented a letter from DR. LLOYD C. <br />NEILSEN, SUPERINTENDENT OF INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 623. <br />Objected to being assessed the commercial rate in Improvements <br />ST-72-l4 and ST-7l-8 on the basis of the playground areas in- <br />cluded in the improvements. Further said that the cost of the <br />improvements exceed the benefits. <br /> <br />MR. MELVIN BARNES, 902 Lovell: Presented a letter signed <br />by 25 people in his neighborhood. They believe the cost of the <br />improvement is an unnecessary expenditure. They live in a dry <br />and sandy area and need all of the water for their lawns and <br />gardens. Asked why the natural drainage pond can't be left where <br />it is. Also asked if the apartment and nursing home in the area <br />would be assessed for the improvement. <br /> <br />MR. ARTHUR HOLMBERG, 985 County Road B-2: "I am right <br />next door to where they chop it off." Said his water goes to the <br />north and east - it does not go south. Asked why he and his <br />neighbors should be included in the improvement. Mr. Short <br />again explained that if an objection is made at the time of an <br />assessment hearing, the CQuncil would view the site to determine <br />whether or not there was a benefit. <br /> <br />~ms. JOHN SAZMA, 1065 Grandview: They have lived across <br />from the swamp for II years and have never had a drainage pro- <br />blem. None of the basements have ever been flooded. <br /> <br />MR. WILLIAM GALLATY, l007 Grandview: Asked if it wouldn't <br />be more economical to put the storm sewer in at the time per- <br />manent streets are constructed. Also asked if there would be any <br />cost to the people in the area for the surveys and studies that <br />have already been made. <br /> <br />MR.. MICHAEL STROM, 937 Grandview: Lives in the middle of <br />the block. Drainage is to the east. Thought this was an exten- <br />sive project just to drain the pond that exists there over to <br />WillOW Pond. Opposed to the improvement. <br /> <br />REV. EMANUAL LUNDBLAD, PRESIDENT OF THE ROSE OF SHARON <br />NURSING HOME, 1000 Lovell: They have a ponding area on their <br />property. Asked if it might not be less expensive to go straight <br />down Lovell to Lexington and take the water from there. Said <br />the improvement is needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.