CC_Minutes_1972_0314 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

MR. KARL SANDBERG, 2983 Chatsworth: Asked what recourse individuals would have if the Council ordered the improvement. Has never had a water problem. Opposes the improvement for that reason. Said he understands that a permanent street and curb and gutter program would follow the storm sewer improvement at some future date. Also opposes this improvement because he's not interested in streets, curbs and gutters. MR. RICHARD CARRIER, 3038 North Victoria: His lot is lower than the street. He maintains an 85 foot, 16 inch culvert in front of his yard. "I do not have one drop of water off my land that flows anywhere toward that drainage. I don't think I should be assessed for this project. My water goes to the east of Victoria." Was informed by Councilman Grauel that only benefit~ ted property would be assessed. Mr. Carrier further said there are other homes on the east side of Victoria that do not contri- bute any water to this project. He was advised to appear at the assessment hearing if the improvement is ordered in. At that time if the Council decides there is no benefit he would receive no assessment. MR. JOHN ANDERSON, 974 Lydia: Asked if the street would be torn up to put in the storm sewer. When told it would go in the boulevard he asked about replacing the sod. Said he doesn't need the storm sewer. Asked where the meteorology reports were and who had prepared them. Asked what portion of the improvement involved Shoreview and if they would be pay- ing assessments. MRS. JUNE DEMOS, 3079 Churchill: Referred specifically to the existing system going down Churchill from Shoreview. In that area the system is adequate. There were only three days in the last nine years when the condition there was as bad as the slides indicated. "Therefore, the only way we will be served to greater advantage is when that land in Shoreview is developed, and development is contemplated." Shoreview is responsible for any increase in water and ~~s. Demos feels Shoreview should be paying the lion's share of the cost, because the people in Roseville don't need the improvement. Further discussed a "waterfall" at Brenner and Churchill. MR. GORDAN HANSON, 958 Lydia Drive: Asked Mr. Short if the water wouldn't be running the same as the pictures show even if the storm sewers were in. MR. JOHN GRAVELLE, 1016 Brenner: Asked if the Council would vote for or against the whole improvement or sections