My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_1980_1117
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
198x
>
1980
>
CC_Minutes_1980_1117
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 8:59:01 AM
Creation date
2/2/2005 5:22:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/17/1980
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />14 <br /> <br />people didn't know about it so some of the people are speaking <br />up about it now because they feel this is their only time to say <br />anything. <br /> <br />MR. DONALD ROSE, 2816 North Oxford: I was one of those who <br />signed the petition last summer. As explained to me, some of my <br />neighbors were having a drainage problem because of some <br />deficiency in the roadway. It was also explained that signing <br />the petition did not mean I was in favor of the project as <br />developed by the City. }1y wife and I bought our property back in <br />1947 and the old-timers then said that the street - Oxford Street - <br />the land had corne from the property owners on the east side and I <br />felt good about that because even though I had a deep lot and it <br />didn't bother me, I thought any improvement - widening the street, <br />for instance - the west siders would be expected to contribute to <br />that, so back in 1972 what does the City do but extend Aglen from <br />Judith to C-2 through the middle of my property so I want to <br />register in opposition to this because of the high cost of <br />developing the roadway and my 1972 e^~erience for which I'm still <br />paying pretty dearly. <br /> <br />MR. GORDON RHEAUME, 2874 North Oxford: I attended a hearing <br />here several months ago about the improvement of County Road C-2. <br />I was given to understand that improvement would end at Oxford <br />Street so I don't know how exactly to attempt to explain to you <br />what happened to my property which is east of Oxford Street, <br />but this beautification, and that's the only reason this was <br />attempted. They installed a bituminous curb. Now, if the natives <br />of shoreview or Arden Hills ever attempt to attack Roseville, I <br />would be very happy to furnish a foxhole and slit trench, thanks to <br />the engineering department of Roseville. Anybody can come and <br />I'll give them cake and coffee and this was not included in that <br />prior meeting. <br /> <br />MRS. JAN SPENCER, 2863 North Oxford: We have been residents <br />there for almost 13 years and I would like to talk to the <br />ecological issue. I feel the trees are important. As an <br />environmentalist I prefer green to black, which is what would <br />happen. I live at the very end and we would go into our yard <br />(inaudible) we would lose 17 trees, and the rest of the block another <br />ten and I can't see the aesthetic value of blacktop compared to <br />that. We chose the neighborhood because of its aesthetic feeling <br />and its (inaudible) value to the citizens there. <br /> <br />MR. GARRY ~~LKE, 2824 North Oxford: I guess I'm in favor <br />of the improvement. I would like to see the street stay the s~~e <br />width in, hopefully in some sort of conciliation with my neighbors <br />on the west that are going to lose property. I feel that the street <br />is in need of repair of some sort. I'm not an engineer so I don't <br />know what that is, but I feel that the street needs something and <br />I guess I'd like to see some sort of a gathering of the minds on <br />this situation. I see three factions - the ones that are totally <br />opposed to the proposal and the ones that don't really care whether <br />the street is 32 feet or whatever but would like it done, and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.