pm_650505 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-2- File 265-65 Rezoning request by Angelo Carbone from R-l to R-3 of the Weinholzer property (approximately 7.5 acres) on north Hamline Avenue south of County Road C. Mr. Richard Vogel, attorney representing Mr. Carbone, stated that very attractive buildings would be constructed on this property, a total of 44 I-bedroom units and 108 2-bedroom units with swimming pool and varied recreation facilities. Some of the property owners closely affected were somewhat concerned about the location of the buildings, the location of the garages, the drainage of surface water, setbacks, etc. They were not actually opposed to the development of the property, some of them said any thing done could not be worse than what there is there now. a swamp. The developer is aware that a storm sewer system will have to be installed to drain the surface water. He also agreed he will consider moving the buildings further north to provide a wider setback on the south side, relocation of the proposed garages, etc. It was suggested that both the zoning and a development plan be considered at the same time. Therefore, Nelson moved, Anderson seconded, that this request be laid over until our next regular meeting on June 2, to give the developer time to prepare a specific development plan to be considered at the same time as the rezoning. Motion passed by a unanimous vote. New Classification I-I A - Mr. Dahlgren submitted a proposed I-IA Planned Industrial District to be added to the village zoning ordinance. This use to be applied on certain properties north of Highway 36 between Fairview and Cleveland. It was suggested the property owners affected should be mailed a notice to appear at our next regular meeting to discuss the proposed new classification. It was also suggested to mail these property owners a copy of the proposed 1~1 A Planned Industrial District. The Secretary was requested to mail these notices. Pi Ie 273-65 Dividing one lot into two lots - Request by Archie Johnson, 2100 North Lexington Avenue. The applicant was not present to explain the need for this request. Therefore, Nelson moved, Anderson seconded, to lay the matter over to the next regular meetingo June 2p 1965. Motion passed by a unanimous vote. File 260 -65 Proposed development design submitted by Garley for the property (approximately 11 acres) situated back of the Hamline Shopping Center on Hamline Avenue between Judith and County Road C=2. Two proposals were submitted - one with the garages bordering the west line of the property, the other with garages south of the proposed "Centennial Drive" street. Some of the property owners on Centennial Drive found it less objectionable to have the garages along the west line of the property as shown on Plan #1~ dated May 5. 1965. Nelson finally movedp Anderson seconded. that Plan #1 dated May 58 1965, be recommended on the condition that sufficient land be dedicated to con- struct a cul-de-sac at the east end of Centennial Drive and that all other conditions such as street patterns. sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water and fence around the low area at the southwest corner be constructed as listed in our recommendations of April 9. 19650 Motion passed by a unanimous vote.