My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_680403
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
196x
>
1968
>
pm_680403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:31:41 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 6:30:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/3/1968
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br /> <br />Subject File 43~~~~ Edward Bossard request for rezoning from R-l to R-6 on Cohansey <br />north of County Road B. <br /> <br />It was moved by Remsburg and seconded by Demos that we lay this over until our next <br />regular meeting in May. Roll Call: unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject Fil~ ~4l-68 George Reiling request for Division of lot at 2740 Lakeview. <br /> <br />It was moved by Anderson and seconded by Carpenter that we recommend to the Council <br />approval of the request for division of lot provided that it be done on a plat basis. <br />Roll Call: unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject File 442-68 <br /> <br />Roberts Construction Company request for rezoning from R-l to <br />I-I at Cleveland and County Road C-2 <br /> <br />Mr. John Daubney spoke on the request for rezoning. This request covers 32 acres. <br />Seven acres at the southwest corner (northeast corner of Cleveland and County Road C-2) <br />of the property would be left for ponding. This leaves 24 acres of property to be <br />built on. The buildings would be one story with no basements and the six buildings <br />would be 37,000 - 45,000 - 45,000 - 48,000 - 30,000 - 37,000 square feet in area. <br />The cost would be 3-1/2 to 4 million dollars. There is a national firm that is inter- <br />ested in leasing the south part of the area if the property is rezoned. No committments <br />as yet, however. <br /> <br />Mr. Arnold Klatt, 2027 West County Road D, wanted to know what were our plans for his <br />six acre triangle of the east side of this property. He stated that he wanted his <br />property rezoned. Mr. Brun, 2891 Arthur Place, said that this was residential when <br />he bought his property which goes to within 170' of Prior extended, which is the east <br />side of the property in question. Was interested in the view of the wild land across <br />the lake from him. He stated that he has two fronts to his house and that they were <br />opposed to the rezoning. Mr. Edward McCarthy, 1894 W. County Road C-2 was opposed to <br />the rezoning. <br /> <br />It waS pointed out that the houses on the south side of County Road C-2 opposite to <br />this property are non-conforming use in land zoned I-l. <br /> <br />It was moved by Remsburg and seconded by Carpenter that we recommend to the Council that <br />they approve the request for rezoning from R-l to 1-1 at Cleveland and County Road C-2 <br />as requested, subject to finalizing of the purchase of the ponding area by the Village <br />of Roseville. Roll Call: unanimous. <br /> <br />Subject File 443-68 W. Mailand request for rezoning and special use permit at 2315 <br />I I Y' North Victoria. <br /> <br />Mr. John Daubney spoke on the request. He stated that there would be 96 units in <br />three buildings. Of these 4S would be two bedroom units and 51 would be one bedroom <br />units. The buildings would be of the french mansard design. There would be under- <br />ground garages and the surface parking would be kept away from the north side of the <br />property. The access would be from Victoria only. Nothing to Lovell. <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Averback had a petition where he represented 21 of the 22 people that he <br />contacted. tIe said they were interested in the access to the property and that we <br />don't allow blacktopping north of the north building line. They were in favor of the <br />rezoning. Mrs. Cook was wondering about access and what would happen to her property <br />when the overpass was put in. It WaS pointed out the access could be put on the west <br />side of her property as there was enough space there. Mr. Lewis Cook and Mrs. Chapple, <br />842 Lovell, also spoke. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.