My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_691001
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
196x
>
1969
>
pm_691001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:31:45 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 6:30:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/1/1969
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />-2- <br /> <br />PLANNING FILE 524-69 - JOHN MERRILL REQUEST FOR DIVISION OF A LOTS AT 2192, 2204, AND <br />2216 ST STEPHENS STREET <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. John Merrill indicated that he would like to divide three lots so that he could build <br />homes fronting on Fulham and St. Stephens Street. He stated that he was before the <br />Planning Commission and Village Council previously and the Council denied his request for <br />a division of four lots in this area. He is now requesting three lots fronting on Fulham <br />to conform with those that now front on St. Stephens Street. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mrs..Jerome Thayer, 2295 West Laurie Road, asked a question concerning the size of the <br />lots to be developed. It was stated that the three lots would be 129 feet frontage with <br />135 foot depth. <br />Mrs. George Seaberg, 2240 St. Stephens Street, asked a question as to what assurance the <br />residents in the area had that these lots would remain the size as indicated. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />DEMOS MOVED, POPE SECONDED, THAT WE RECOt.f\1END THAT '!HE REQUEST OF JOHN MERRILL FOR DIVISION <br />OF LOTS AT 2192, 2204 AND 2216 ST. STEPHENS STREET BE APPROVED. ROLL CALL, AYES: <br />CARPENTER, DEMOS, POPE, EDLUND, MEMBREZ. NAYS: NONE. <br /> <br />PLANNING FILE 527-69 - RAMSEY COUN1Y PROPOSED PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF LEXINGTON AVENUE <br />FROM LARPENTEUR AVENUE TO T .H. 36. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />r <br /> <br />Mr. Floyd Snyker, Assistant Ramsey County Engineer, and Mr. Howard Dahlgren presented the <br />plans for the upgrading of Lexington Avenue between Larpenteur Avenue and T.H. 36. <br /> <br />It appears that the upgrading of Lexington Avenue is now a question of design mainly with <br />the median strip as proposed and the plans submitted by the County. The question is: <br />"Should the median strip be constructed, and if so, where and to what extent along Lexington <br />Avenue ?" <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren indicated that perhaps it was not essential to have the median strip all the <br />way on Lexington Avenue. He suggested and presented an overlay which outlined the area <br />which would appear to be more conducive to the use of a median strip than others. The <br />commercial area just north of Larpenteur Avenue appears to have a greater need for median <br />strip which would contain left turning and holding lanes to service the commercial property <br />on both sides of Lexington Avenue just north of Larpenteur Avenue. The residential area on <br />Lexington Avenue would appear to have no real need for a median strip all the way up on <br />Lexington Avenue. Mr. Dahlgren and Mr. Snyker further indicated that perhaps median <br />and left turning lanes would be necessary at Roselawn and County Road B. There also was <br />a question as to the money needed to finance this project with and without the median strip <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Bob Margo, 1123 Ruggles, had a question as to the slope on Ruggles and Garden coming onto <br />Lexington Avenue. <br />Mr. Herb Green, 1871 Lexington Avenue, asked if there were any plans for the upgrading of <br />Lexington Avenue beyond T.H. 36. <br />Mr. Snyker answered this question by stating that there were plans to upgrade Lexington <br />Avenue to the northern terminus. <br />~. Green also had a question as to the problems of traffic at County Road B-2 and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.