pm_710602 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3~ The request before the Plaming Commission was to revise the Shopping Center site plan to include a garden center and a variance of 20 feet to the setback requirements of the garden center. The Village code requires a setback of 100 feet and the Center would be setback.80 feet. t.1r. Emerson indicated that the p1acerent of the Garden Center was based on studles condtcted by the Barton Ashton Associates regarding traffic patterns within the shopping center area. Recommendat ion Mr. Pope Moved and Mr. Kellett Seconded, that the Conunission recommend approval of the request by Dayton Th;!velopment Corrpany for amended special use permit on planned develop- ment of Rosedale Center and variance to setback and parking for Dayton Garden Center (Bachman' 5) at Rose dale . Roll Call, Ayes: Th;!mos, Jolmson, Pope, Kellett and Membrez. Nays: Eagles and Edlund. Mr. Kellett Moved and Mr. Johnson Seconded, that the Conmission recommend that the Village Council request a general stateTrent from Dayton IX!ve1opmmt Corporation stating that the general planning concept sho\Vll. on the submitted master plan will be followed in future developnents of Rosedale Center. Roll Call, Ayes: ~mos, Johnson, Pope, Eagles, Kellett, Edlund and Mambrez. Nays: None. Planning File 625-71 - O'Halloran and Murphy request for variance to sign setback at 1360 Commerce Street Presentation Mr. John O'Ha1loran representing O'Halloran and Murphy, indicated that the firm needed the sign as a means of identification. He stated that the sign that now exists is temporary and that the proposed sign would be permanent. Recommendation Mr. Edltmd Moved and Mr. Eagles Seconded, that the Corrmission recoIIJnend approval of the request by O'Halloran and Murphy for a variance to sign setback at 1360 Commerce Street. Roll Call, Ayes: Jolmsm, Pope, Eagles, Kellett, Edlund and t-.1embrez. Nays: ~mos. Planning File 626-71 - Raymond F. Schreurs request for variance to front yard setback at 3058 North Wilder Presentation Mr. Schreurs indicated that he proposes to convert his existing garage into a stD1room and build a new garage attached to the house in front of the present garage. The new garage would extend 8 feet in front of the house. The Village Code provides that the attached garage may project only 3 feet into the front yard, therefore, a 5 foot variance is required. Discussion Mr. Membrez indicated that he could not see any problems that would be caused by granting the request. There was no opposition from the audience.