pm_710804 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3.. Mr. Edlund felt that the developer deserves direction from the Planning Commission to eliminate the need for unnecessary expense. He indicated that he was in favor of the project. Mrs. Demos stated her intent to cast a "yes" vote on the proposal. She felt that the Verde Haven residents have been well taken care of in the past. She also would rather see the property developed as proposed rather than lYD.ll tiple family dwellings. Mr. Eagles agreed that he would prefer to see conmercial development on the property rather than apartnents. I-e could not foresee the property being developed for single family residences. Mr. Pope stated that he had always hoped that the property would be developed as a professional/cormnercial center. He felt that this was an excellent project and would undoubtedly be a credit to the Village of Roseville. Reconmendation Mr. Kellett r-bved and Mr. Edlund Seconded, that the Commission recOJTl1lend approval of Zinunennan's Realty request for rezoning from R-l to BIB, Special Use Permit, and Variance to height limitation and setback at 2350 North Snelling Avenue, with the following conditions: 1. That all teclmicalities of Village ordinances be &atisfied by the developer. 2. That re..conveyance of the flowage easenent be granted by the Village and the State of Minnesota. Roll Call, Ayes: Demos, Eagles, Kellett, Edlund and Pope. Nays: None. Plarming File 631-71 - Jolm Killian request for variance to front and side yard setbacks at 2780 North Galtier Street Presentaticn Mr. Killian indicated that he was proposing to remove an existing single garage and construct a new double attached garage with a family room located behind the garage. The new garage would project 5 feet into the front yard. Village ordinance provides that an attached garage may project 3 feet into the front yard. He stated that the garage would also extend to within 5-1/2 feet of his side yard lot line while the Village ordinance requires a lO foot setback. Therefore, he was request- ing front yard and side yard variances. Discussion Mr. Pope asked if there was any way that the applicant could rove the garage back so that he was in canpliance with the ordinance. Mr. Killian indicated that it was not possible to move the garage back because he would not be able to have an entrance from his present hone into the proposed family room. Mr. Cliff Battanden, 2772 Galtier, who lives next door to Mr. Killian indicated that he moved in with the knowledge that the sideyard setback would be 10 feet and that he desired that it stay that way. Mr. Kellett asked if it was not possible in the case of a detached garage to place it within 5 feet of side yard located in the rear of the property. Mr. Goldberg indicated that it was.