My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_711006
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
197x
>
1971
>
pm_711006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:31:48 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:13:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/6/1971
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.2- <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr. Chester Yanik, representing Deluxe Check Printers, stated that they were re. <br />questing a variance to pennit extending their parking lot to within 10 feet of <br />their property line on County Road B. He indicated that the Village Code requires <br />a setback of 15 feet. The need for additional parking spaces for the finn <br />employees was the reason for the request. Thirty.four more parking spaces would be <br />provided. The area which would be converted to parking is presently grass. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Membrez stated that he would have no objection to the variance except for the <br />fact that if the variance were granted requests would then be received from other <br />property owners in the area and before long the entire area would have only a <br />10 foot setback. <br /> <br />Mrs. Demos indicated that when the new addition was put on the building a few years <br />ago, no allowance was made for additional parking and, therefore, the parking pro. <br />blem has now developed. <br /> <br />Mr. Kapitan, 1446 W. County Road B, expressed his opposition to the variance, <br />because he too felt that if this variance were granted other property owners would be <br />requesting the same. He also stated that with most of the area a1 ready in parking <br />lot, that a wind from the west makes his property and his neighbors the garbage can <br />of the area. Mr. Yanich indicated that he understood and appreciate the comments of <br />the gentleman and he was certainly willing to try and work out a mutual agreenent. He <br />stated that if necessary the company could allow their employees to park on Pascal <br />Avenue which theypresently are not allowed to do by company policy. <br /> <br />Mr. Membrez stated that as the request stands he would be against it because of his <br />theory that the granting of the variance would mean further requests for the same. <br /> <br />Mr. Yanich indicated that he would be happy to meet with the residents and that <br />DeLuxe Check Printers were open to their suggestions and hoped to cooperate in any <br />way possible. <br /> <br />RecoIIUTendaticn <br /> <br />Mr. Eagles roved and Mr. Kellett seconded, that DeLuxe Check Printers request for <br />parking setback at 2199 North Pascal Avenue be laid over until the next regular <br />Planning COImnission meeting. Roll Call, Ayes: Eagles, Demos, Kellett and Membrez. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 646.71 . Rosemary Marley request for variance to side yard setback at <br />471 Centennial Drive <br /> <br />Presentatioo <br /> <br />Mr. George Wicker, Wicker Realtors, indicated that the applicant proposes to build <br />a 20 foot wide detached garage along side the present home. The garage would be <br />within 6.9 feet of the side yard; whereas, the code requires a 10 foot setback. In <br />addition, the garage would be 5 feet from the existing house on the lot and the <br />Village Code requires that accessory buildings shall be 6 feet from any other build. <br />ing on the same lot. The design of the home prohibits attaching the garage to the <br />house. ~1r. Wicker indicated that the sale of the lot is subject to the granting of <br />the variance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.