pm_711201 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-4.. Reconmendation Mr. Edlund Moved and Mr. Pope seconded, that the Conunission recoJl11\end approval of Warren J. Brennan's request for divisioo of a lot at 972 Woodhill Drive. Roll Call, Ayes: Kellett, Demos, Pope, Jolmson, Edl\D1d and Membrez. Nays: None. Planninjl File 658..71 Ken Reinhardt request for rezoning fran R..l to R..3 and divisioo of a lot and variance to building code at 2395 North Dale Street Presentaticn Mr. Reinhardt presented plans of his proposed development to the Commission. Discussioo Mr. Membrez indicated that there has not been any approval of an R..3 rezoning since the establishJrent of the R..3A category. Be indicated that the R..3 zoning is for the garden type of apartment. Mrs. Dems indicated that at the time of the change in the ordinance providing for the R..3A zoning, that the Convnission had been advised there would be no additional applications allowed mder the R.3 category, however, the R..3 zoning must remain in the ordinance because there already existed R-3 zonings in the Village. She indicated that she believed the statement at that time and now was disturbed by the fact that an application for R.3 was being allowed. Mr. Stuber, COlD1ty Road B.2, indicated his oppositiat to any more apartments in Roseville until those already constructed are fully occupied. He questioned where all the children of addi donal apartments in the Village are going to play. Mr. Stuber also rexpressed concern over the traffic problem at the B..2 and Dale intersection and felt that the construction of addi tia1a1 apartment buildings in that location would only intensify that problem. Mrs. Demos inquired as to whether or not the developer had considered the possibility of double boungelows. Mr. Reinhardt stated that he didn't think it would be feasible for boungelow development on that 10catiat. Mr. Reinhardt also indicated that at present he has only 2 or 3 children, all under school age, living in his existing two apartment buildings and that he does not intend to permit children in his apart~ nents. All the apartJOOnt units in the existing buildings and the proposed build~ ing are one bedroom. Mr. Reinhardt also stated that he intended on using the same type of landscaping for the proposed building as at the existing two buildings. Mr. Edlund indicated that although the property was suggested for mixed development under the Comprehensive Plan that the proposal was a good one and he would. vote for the application. Mrs. Deoos indicated that she was opposed to the application because, (1) she would not vote for any R.3 application and (2) the proposed development does not consist of medium density but is of high density and is, therefore, not a mixed development as proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. .