pm_720105 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3- Planning File 663-71 - Carl B. Fisher, Preliminary Plat "Len Ruth Estates", 1930 West County Road B Presentation Mr. Carl Fisher indicated that the property is presently zoned R-l and contains 4.2 acres. He is seeking preliminary plat approval for nine single family residential lots. All lots meet tile minimum square footage requirements. Discussion Mrs. Demos inquired if lots 4 and 6 have the required 85 foot width at the setback. Mro Fisher replied in the affirmativeo Reconunendation Mr. Kellett Hoved and Mrs. Demos Seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of Carl Bo Fisher's preliminary plat "Len Ruth Estates", 1930West County Road Do Roll Call, Ayes: Demos, Kellett, Go Johnson, Vo Johnson and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 664-71 - Dayton Development Company request for vacation of portion of Fairview Avenue between 111 36 and B-2 Presentation Mr 0 John Abbott of the Dayton Development Corporation indicated that the property in question was part of the right-of-way for Fairview Avenue conveyed to the Village in 1970. Because the intersection of 111 36 and Fairview Avenue has been completed and the property in question has not been utilized, the Dayton Development Corpor- ation is seeking to have the parcel vacated, and revert back to the Dayton Development Corporation. Mr. Abbott indicated tllat it was merely a mechanical procedure. Recommendation Mr. V. Johnson Moved and Mr. Kellett Seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of Dayton Development Corporation's request for vacation of a portion of Fairview between TI-l 36 and B-2. Roll Call, Ayes: Demos, Kellett G. Johnson, V. Johnson and Pope. Nays: None. Planning File 665=71 = Gunnar Pettersen request for rezoning from R-l to B=l and variance at 2410 North Dale Street Mro Pettersen indicated that he proposes to construct a single family home with an attached beauty shop. The property consists of approximately 1.IZ acres. He stated he is requesting tllat the westerly 135 feet of the parcel be rezoned B=l. The attached beauty shop would sit on that portion of the parcel. The remainder of the parcel would stay R- L Discussion Mrs. Demos asked whether the parking lot met setback requirements 0 Mr. Pettersen indicated it dido Gordon Hunnicutt, 582 Transit, expressed concern about the traffic generated by the patrons using the beauty salono He said no doubt it was a nice looking home but that a 20 car parking lot in a residential area is just too much.