Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-2- <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Pope asked what the approximate tenure of a firefighter was at the present time, <br />He was told that once a man joined the unit he normally stayed until retirement <br />unless he roved out of the city. <br /> <br />G. Johnson asked if the station would serve the same area regardless of which site <br />it was placed on. He was told it would. <br /> <br />Mr. Grauel stated that in the past when the authorized strength of the fire department <br />was raised to 60 firefighters the intent was to provide trained men for the future, <br />He stated that we must now consider if we should again raise the authorized strength <br />to provide trained men for the future. <br /> <br />Donna Richter, 400 West County Road B, stated that she couldn't see why we were <br />considering the station at Minnesota and Western as cars can't make it up the hill <br />in slippery weather and the corner has poor visibility when exiting from the pro- <br />posed site. <br /> <br />Everett Peterson, 373 West Sandhurst Drive, stated that the area at the intersection <br />of Western and B is zoned at the present time for R-l and that if the station was built <br />it would probably be impossible to develop that land as single family residential. He <br />felt that this area would then be developed with apartments which would be deterimental <br />to the adjacent single family dwellings, <br /> <br />G. Htmnicut t, 582 Transit Avenue, was opposed to the site on the O'Neill property as <br />it would be too near the many schools in the area. <br /> <br />RecoJ1'OOOndat ion <br /> <br />Mr. V. Johnson moved and Mr. G, Johnson seconded, that the Corrunission recorrunend to <br />the Council that the fire station site be considered from the following list as given <br />in the descending order of priority: <br /> <br />G - SW corner of Dale and Lovell <br />D - SW corner of Dale and B-2 <br />A. NW corner of Minnesota and B <br />B. SE corner of Dale and B <br /> <br />Mr. Pope roved and Mr. Kellett seconded, to amend the original motion to read: <br /> <br />F. D, A, B. <br /> <br />Roll Call on the amendment to motion: Ayes: Kellett, Grauel, Pope. Nays: <br />V. Johnson and G. Johnson. <br /> <br />Roll Call on the amended motion: Ayes: V. Johnson, Kellett, Grauel, G. Johnson, <br />Pope. Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 815 - Shafer Contracting Company Request for Special Use Permit at <br />644, 646 and 656 County Road C <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Robert Rudie, representing Shafer Contracting, presented profile plans for the pro- <br />posed excavation of gravel material from the subject lots. He briefly reviewed his <br />presentation of the last Commission meeting. <br />