pm_750604 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-5- Mr, Reinhardt stated that he would operate the apartments, My, Johnson commented that he liked the existing apartments and that he would favor this rezoning application, Mr, Rukavina commented that the property is very well maintained and that the apartments are some of the nicer appearing ones in the city, Recommendat ion My, Kellett moved and Mr, G, Johnson seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of Ken Reinhardt's request for rezoning from R-l to R-3A at 2395 North Dale. Roll Call, Ayes Rukavina, Mastel, Cushing, G, Johnson, Kellett and Grauel, Nays: None, Planning File 893 -- Ken Reinhardt request for division of lot at 913 Sherren Presentation Mr, Reinhardt indicated that the City is currently constructing a street through the area and that he proposes to dIVIde the lot to conform to the street construction. Discussion Mr, Dahlgren indicated that the proposed division would fit pcrfectly with the street plan in the area, Recommendation Mr, Rukavina moved and Mr, Kellett seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of Ken Reinhardt's request for division of lot at 913 Sherren, Roll Call, Ayes: Rukavina, Mastel, Cushing, G. Johnson, Kellett and Grauel. Nays: None, Planning File 894 - Shafer Contracting Company request for special use permit at 644, 646 and 656 County Road C Presentation Mr. Don Wozniak, attorney, indicated that in February 1974, an identical application was made and in May 1974, the Council denied the application for the special use permit and authorized the obtaining of appraisals on the property for the potential purchase of the property for park land. He stated that no offer has been made for the property and that if the city wants to buy it for park, thats fine, but that action must be taken to purchase it now, He stated that if the City condemns the property that they would obviously have to pay for the gravel on the property, He asked the Commission to consider the possibility of selling the gravel on the City property and also granting the special use permit to the applicant for the excavation of the gravel on the private property, Discussion Mr, Grauel commented that in 1973 Shafer Contracting Company had agreed to seed another area which had been excavated, The area has still not been seeded, Mr, Rudy indicated that this was true but that they were hoping this applicat10n for spec- ial use permit for further excavation would be approved and that they could then seed the entire area at one time.