pm_760303 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

- 3- ~ Dave MacLean representing the Roseville Citizens Action Group indicated that they met regarding the applications and had concerns regarding the water pollution 'vhich would occur because of the development. He stated that the Citizens Action Group believed the 'vater study of the Langdon Lake drainage area should be completed before the de- velopment is approved. ~Ir. Robert Thompson, representing the Fairview }fuights Civic Association presented a "Titten statement to the Commission and voiced concerns about water and noise pollu- tion as a result of the proposed development. He concluded by asking that before development occurs in the area, the drainage area study should be conducted and in- dicated that the Fairview Heights Civic Association recommends that the proposal not be approved at this time. Mr. Simons indIcated that he was concerned about the types of plantings that were included in the landscape plan. Mr. Dahlgren stated that if the Commission desires, a condition could be attached that 'vould require the landscape plan to be approved by the City. Mr. Simons also indi- cated that he was disappointed in the information 1vhich had been provided by the app- licant regarding the noise generated from his property. He felt that more complete information could have bee~_presented. Y'_.~ Mr. G. Johnson stated that PIK Terminal is a business which wants to move ahead. He indicated that, the Planning Commission, when the application was previously considered, recommended that the study of the Langdon Lake drainage area be undertaken. However. because the application had been denied by the Council, the drainage study had not been done. He felt the applicant had done all he could to fulfill the drainage re- quirements. !\IT. Johnson favored recommending approval of the proposal. !\~. Rukavina stated that he saw a good faith attempt on the part of the applicant , to develop a good proposal and he felt it was a fine proposal. ~IT. V. Johnson stated that in his opinion, the strongest point of opposition is the question of whether the drainage area study or the development should be done first. He stated that 'this was a thoughtfully conceived development plan and that the applicant had gone out of his way to develop an excellent plan. !\Ir. Kellett stated that the applicant has done all the planning that is within his ability. Recommendation Mr. G. Johnson moved and Mr. Kellett seconded that the Commission recoIIID1end approval of PIK Terminal's request for rezoning from I-I to 1-2, special use permit, vacation of right-of-way and conditional use permit at 2690 Prior Avenue ~~th the following conditions: 1) That the ~vner shall develop the truck terminal facilities in aEcordance with plans submitted and dated February 26, 197b. 2) That the Owner agrees to dedIcate approximately 10.6 acres of land shown on plans dated March 27, 1975. The exact property lines shall be subject to adjustment to the extent that the minimum depth of dedication shall be 100 feet from the control level line of Langton Lake as described by survey after melting of snow cover in the Spring of 1976.