pm_760407 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-6- HI'. Don Johnson, resident on Milh'ood, indicated that he hoped the increased nm-off caused by this development to COLmty Ditch No. 4 would be looked at very thoroughly. !llr. David Christianson, 1498 Centennial Drive, indicated that he Has opposed to the development, and felt it would be unfair to place the senior citizens so close to the noise on Snelling Avenue. ~~. Lehr indicated that the one bedroom units and the elderly apartments 11DUld be 638 square feet and that the bedroom would be at least 120 square feet. Mr. Rukavina felt that it was a good proposal and that he was in favor of it. He thought it was something that Roseville needed in the comw~mity. Hr. V. Johnson indicated that he was impressed with the existing development in Golden Valley and that it provided a mixed community 1vith a range of ages and a range of econowic donditions. Recommendation Mr. Rukavina moved and Mr. Kellett seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of Canadian Financial Corporation's request for rezoning from B-2 to R-3, special use permit and variance to building height, floor area ratio, lot area and parking at 2800 North Snelling Avenue with the following conditions: 1. That the total development shall be constructed in accordance l~ith plans as submitted by the applicant and approved by the Ci~J as prepared by Winsor, Faricy, Architects, Inc. dated April 7, 1976. 2. That it specifically be recognized and a-reed that the 7 story structure consisting of 122 units are designed and approved with room size standards, parking accommodation and contiguol~ open space sufficient only for occupancy by the elderly. At no time should less than 90 % of the occupants, other than handicapped~ be less than 62 years of age. The condition shall apply regardless of future ownership or change in rental programs. It is recognized that the project is approved consistent "ith a policy deter- mination that the site plan and specific buildings within it are approved solely to meet a specialized housing need in the Civj. 3. Further delineation of the plans and specifications for site \I'ork, buildings and utilities shall be subject to approval of the Public Works Director. Any major changes in plans as approved in this special use pemit can be accomplished only by the processing of a new application and appropriate public hearing for an amended special use permit. 4. That provisions for meeting the life safety code shall be as approved by the City Fire JlJarshal. That the maintenance of all structures, grounds, utilities, ponding area and roa&~ays be the permanent responsibility of the developer and/or his assigns. ~1aintenance not so accomplished in a reasonable manner shall be done by the City and assessed against the property.