Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 2- <br /> <br />Planning File 973 - Lillian Holmberg division of lot at 296 Minnesota Avenue <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mrs. Holmberg indicated that she presently owns 204 feet of frontage property on <br />Minnesota Avenue. She is requesting the Planning Corrmission to recoITmend approval <br />of a lot division which would form one lot of lOa feet and one lot of 104 feet, <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />Mr. Rukavina moved and Mr. Mastel seconded, that the Commission reconnnend approval <br />of Lillian Holmberg's request for division of lot at 296 Minnesota. Roll Call, Ayes: <br />Rukavina, Mastel, Simons, G, Johnson, V. Johnson. Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 974 - Walter White request for division of lot at 2815 Long Lake Road <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. Jean Parranto, representing Walter White, owner of the property, and also of the <br />property directly to the north, explained to the Commission that the division of lot was <br />requested for the purposes of business expansion. The southerly half of the lot is to <br />be used for a proposed expansion of the present Clutch and Transmission operation. <br />Mr. White indicated that he did not have any plans for the northerly half of the lot <br />being divided, however, he felt that it would most probably be paved and used for parking. <br /> <br />RecoTIUOOndation <br /> <br />Mr. G. Johnson moved, Mr. Rukavina seconded, that the Commission recommend approval of <br />Walter White's request for division of lot at 2815 Long Lake Road, Roll Call, Ayes: <br />Rukavina, Mastel, Simons, G. Johnson, V. Johnson. Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 978 - Hess Kline request for variance to sign size at 2767 Long Lake Road <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Mr, Jean Parranto, represented the owner, Hess Kline. He indicated that the Kline Volvo <br />Dealership has an identity problem in that traffic travelling north along Long Lake Road <br />has no definite way to identify the building as being the Kline Volvo building. He is <br />proposing to take an existing sign that is presently located on the Oldsmobile Dealer- <br />ship, also owned by Mr, Kline, that says "Volvo" and placing it on the south elevation <br />of the Volvo Dealership. To this would then be purchased a sign that read "Kline" so <br />that the south elevation of the building would be signed "Kline Volvo" in lIDifonn <br />letters, He indicated that the ordinance has a maximtnn allowable footage for such a <br />sign of 151 sq. ft, and that the sign they were proposing to place on the structure would <br />be approximately 400 sq, ft, A major reason for wanting to take the one sign from the <br />Oldsmobile Dealership and place it on the Volvo Dealership would be the substantial <br />savings in cost of fabrication. <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />Mr. G. Johnson asked that should the Planning Commission recommend approval, would <br />Mr, Kline be agreeable to eliminate the present painted window signs. <br />Mr. Simons asked if the applicant would be agreeable to put no signs on the east side <br />of the building should these variances be approved. <br />Mr. V, Johnson asked Howard Dahlgren to clarify the sign ordinance, particularly as <br />it pertains to the calculation of maximum sizes allowed, <br />