pm_760602 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-3- John Rukavina stated that the variance, if granted, would accomplish two things. It would eliminate a sign on one building and it did provide an aesthetically pleasing sign for the newer structure, Reconnnendation Mr. Rukavina roved and Mr, G. Johnson secondeds that the Connnission reconnnend approval of Hess Kline's request for variance to sign size at 2767 Long Lake Road, subject to the following conditions: 1. That approval be contingent upon not permitting a sign on the front of the building and 2, That the painted window signs be eliminated. Roll Call, Ayes: Rukavina, Mastel, Simms, G. Johnson, V. Johnson, Nays: None, Planning File 975 ~ Victor Vik's request for preliminary plat IIVik Addition" at 2200 Fulham Presentation Mr. Victor R, Vjk indicated that his family was requesting approval of a platting of a parcel of land along Fulham, This is the same land which approval had been asked for in 1971. Mr. Vik recapped the history of the former application and indicated that he pre- sently had potential buyers for some of the lots which would eventually have homes in the $70,000 range placed upon them, Discussion John Rukavina asked that by platting his parcel of land it appeared to land lock three parcels of land directly to the east of him, Mr. Vik replied that this had been a concern of the Council at his past application and that although attempts had been made to resolve this problem, the landowners at that time could not agree upon a common solution. My. Dahlgren then indicated that access to the rear of tho~ parcels could be provided via a cuI de sac running north from County Road B between two existing homes and termin- ating to the Tear of those existing homes. Mr. Ben Jerrai of 2191 Fulham indicated that he had opposed this plat in the past and opposes it now, The main reason being the lots do not have the same amolUlt of frontage as the lots immediately across the street, Mr, Tomisak, 2203 Fulham, stated that he felt the east side should be consistent with the west side and would have no objection to the platting if Mr. Vik were to plat only three lots instead of four. Mr. Dahlgren stated in response to many statements by the interested adjacent property owners that he could see no relationship between lot size and value of homes in that very expensive homes were being built on very small lots 0 Mr, Mastel commented that it seemed the most opposition was coming from the people who lived to the west of the proposed plat and that although it would seem that this plat would hinder future development of the properties to the east, they were not objecting at this time.