pm_791003 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

-5- Mr. Vern Johnson indicated that he believed the problem could not be avoided, and that the Corrmission did not have the right to decide what was best for business. After further discussion of the revised plan as presented by Mr. Dahlgren, Mr. George Johnson IIDVed to approve the request except that the area directly in front of the building not be fenced. in. Mrs. Dressler seconded this IIDtion. 'Ihe roll call was: Ayes: Cushing, Sirrons, Dressler, G. Johnson, V. Johnson. Nays: None. Abstention: Rukavina and Mastel. Mr. Rukavina indicated that he didn't have enough information to vote on the m:Jtion at this tine. Planning File 1228 - Margolis Brothers request for preliminary plat at l76l Farrington Presentation Mr. Dahlgren indicated that the property in question was an area of platted land contiguous to Farrington Avenue on the west side. In addition, the applicant had purchased a piece of land at the southeast corner of Lot 4 so that the lot in question would be accessible from Farrington. He also indicated that certain areas to the east and south on Lot 4, would be restricted from being built on by private deed restrictions in favor of the present owners of Lot 5. Mr. Dahlgren had discussed the proposal and felt that this was the best solution for the property in question. Mr. Honchell then indicated that in looking at the proposed southerly lot line of Lot 4, he felt it might be a good idea to nove this line slightly to the south thus providing an additional 6 feet of frontage on Farrington. 'nlis would permit a driveway to be built without requiring a variance. Discussion Mr. Norrran Brody appearing for the applicant, indicated he didn't feel there would be any objection to the increased frontage and that the angle of the southerly lot line could be changed so that 6 additional feet of frontage would be provided. Mr. Hoppwood of the audience asked what the tentative use of the 60 foot easement to the south of the proposed addition would be used for and how it would be iItproved? Mr. Dahlgren indicated that it was primarily for access to Tamarack Park and that it was up to the city whether this would be paved or left the way it currently is. Mr. Honchell then indicated that the extension of utili ties l1UlSt be provided for. Recamendation Mr. George Johnson IIDved and Mr. Rukavina seconded, that the Comnission recormend approval of the Margolis Brothers request for preliminary plat at l76l Farrington with the follCM- ing conditions: a. 'Ihat the adjustnent of the lot line between IDts 3 and 4 be done so as to provide a 26 foot frontage on Farrington to Lot 4. b. 'Ihat it be noted that the extension of utili ties are necessary. Roll Call, AYel3: Rukavina, Cushing, Mastel, SiIIDns, Dressler, George Johnson, Vem Johnson. Nays: None.